Re: [PATCH] ACPI / scan: Send the change uevent with offine environmental data

2018-03-19 Thread joeyli
Hi Rafael, 

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:02:32AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, March 2, 2018 7:35:08 AM CET Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> > In current design of ACPI container offline, Kernel emits
> > KOBJ_CHANGE uevent to user space to indidate that the ejection of
> > the container was triggered by platform. (caa73ea15 patch)
> > 
> > A pure KOBJ_CHANGE uevent is not enough for user space to identify
> > the purpose. For example, a "udevadm trigger" command can also
> > be used to emit change event to all udev rules. A udev rule can not
> > identify that the event is from kernel for offline or from udevadm
> > for other purpose. Then the offline action in udev rule may also be
> > triggered by udevadm tool.
> > 
> > So, similar to the change uevent of dock, kernel sends the
> > KOBJ_CHANGE uevent with a offline environmental data to indicate
> > purpose. It's useful by udev rule for using ENV{EVENT} filter.
> > 
> > Cc: Michal Hocko  
> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki"  
> > Cc: Len Brown  
> > Signed-off-by: "Lee, Chun-Yi" 
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/scan.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > index 8e63d93..f6dca9b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ bool acpi_scan_is_offline(struct acpi_device *adev, 
> > bool uevent)
> >  {
> > struct acpi_device_physical_node *pn;
> > bool offline = true;
> > +   static const char *envp[] = { "EVENT=offline", NULL };
> >  
> > /*
> >  * acpi_container_offline() calls this for all of the container's
> > @@ -126,7 +127,7 @@ bool acpi_scan_is_offline(struct acpi_device *adev, 
> > bool uevent)
> > list_for_each_entry(pn, >physical_node_list, node)
> > if (device_supports_offline(pn->dev) && !pn->dev->offline) {
> > if (uevent)
> > -   kobject_uevent(>dev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE);
> > +   kobject_uevent_env(>dev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE, 
> > envp);
> >  
> > offline = false;
> > break;
> > 
> 
> This causes build issues when applied, please fix.
> 

I just sent the v2 patch. Thanks for your review!

Joey Lee 


Re: [PATCH] ACPI / scan: Send the change uevent with offine environmental data

2018-03-19 Thread joeyli
Hi Rafael, 

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:02:32AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, March 2, 2018 7:35:08 AM CET Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> > In current design of ACPI container offline, Kernel emits
> > KOBJ_CHANGE uevent to user space to indidate that the ejection of
> > the container was triggered by platform. (caa73ea15 patch)
> > 
> > A pure KOBJ_CHANGE uevent is not enough for user space to identify
> > the purpose. For example, a "udevadm trigger" command can also
> > be used to emit change event to all udev rules. A udev rule can not
> > identify that the event is from kernel for offline or from udevadm
> > for other purpose. Then the offline action in udev rule may also be
> > triggered by udevadm tool.
> > 
> > So, similar to the change uevent of dock, kernel sends the
> > KOBJ_CHANGE uevent with a offline environmental data to indicate
> > purpose. It's useful by udev rule for using ENV{EVENT} filter.
> > 
> > Cc: Michal Hocko  
> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki"  
> > Cc: Len Brown  
> > Signed-off-by: "Lee, Chun-Yi" 
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/scan.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > index 8e63d93..f6dca9b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ bool acpi_scan_is_offline(struct acpi_device *adev, 
> > bool uevent)
> >  {
> > struct acpi_device_physical_node *pn;
> > bool offline = true;
> > +   static const char *envp[] = { "EVENT=offline", NULL };
> >  
> > /*
> >  * acpi_container_offline() calls this for all of the container's
> > @@ -126,7 +127,7 @@ bool acpi_scan_is_offline(struct acpi_device *adev, 
> > bool uevent)
> > list_for_each_entry(pn, >physical_node_list, node)
> > if (device_supports_offline(pn->dev) && !pn->dev->offline) {
> > if (uevent)
> > -   kobject_uevent(>dev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE);
> > +   kobject_uevent_env(>dev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE, 
> > envp);
> >  
> > offline = false;
> > break;
> > 
> 
> This causes build issues when applied, please fix.
> 

I just sent the v2 patch. Thanks for your review!

Joey Lee 


Re: [PATCH] ACPI / scan: Send the change uevent with offine environmental data

2018-03-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, March 2, 2018 7:35:08 AM CET Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> In current design of ACPI container offline, Kernel emits
> KOBJ_CHANGE uevent to user space to indidate that the ejection of
> the container was triggered by platform. (caa73ea15 patch)
> 
> A pure KOBJ_CHANGE uevent is not enough for user space to identify
> the purpose. For example, a "udevadm trigger" command can also
> be used to emit change event to all udev rules. A udev rule can not
> identify that the event is from kernel for offline or from udevadm
> for other purpose. Then the offline action in udev rule may also be
> triggered by udevadm tool.
> 
> So, similar to the change uevent of dock, kernel sends the
> KOBJ_CHANGE uevent with a offline environmental data to indicate
> purpose. It's useful by udev rule for using ENV{EVENT} filter.
> 
> Cc: Michal Hocko  
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki"  
> Cc: Len Brown  
> Signed-off-by: "Lee, Chun-Yi" 
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/scan.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index 8e63d93..f6dca9b 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ bool acpi_scan_is_offline(struct acpi_device *adev, bool 
> uevent)
>  {
>   struct acpi_device_physical_node *pn;
>   bool offline = true;
> + static const char *envp[] = { "EVENT=offline", NULL };
>  
>   /*
>* acpi_container_offline() calls this for all of the container's
> @@ -126,7 +127,7 @@ bool acpi_scan_is_offline(struct acpi_device *adev, bool 
> uevent)
>   list_for_each_entry(pn, >physical_node_list, node)
>   if (device_supports_offline(pn->dev) && !pn->dev->offline) {
>   if (uevent)
> - kobject_uevent(>dev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE);
> + kobject_uevent_env(>dev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE, 
> envp);
>  
>   offline = false;
>   break;
> 

This causes build issues when applied, please fix.

Thanks!




Re: [PATCH] ACPI / scan: Send the change uevent with offine environmental data

2018-03-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, March 2, 2018 7:35:08 AM CET Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> In current design of ACPI container offline, Kernel emits
> KOBJ_CHANGE uevent to user space to indidate that the ejection of
> the container was triggered by platform. (caa73ea15 patch)
> 
> A pure KOBJ_CHANGE uevent is not enough for user space to identify
> the purpose. For example, a "udevadm trigger" command can also
> be used to emit change event to all udev rules. A udev rule can not
> identify that the event is from kernel for offline or from udevadm
> for other purpose. Then the offline action in udev rule may also be
> triggered by udevadm tool.
> 
> So, similar to the change uevent of dock, kernel sends the
> KOBJ_CHANGE uevent with a offline environmental data to indicate
> purpose. It's useful by udev rule for using ENV{EVENT} filter.
> 
> Cc: Michal Hocko  
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki"  
> Cc: Len Brown  
> Signed-off-by: "Lee, Chun-Yi" 
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/scan.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index 8e63d93..f6dca9b 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ bool acpi_scan_is_offline(struct acpi_device *adev, bool 
> uevent)
>  {
>   struct acpi_device_physical_node *pn;
>   bool offline = true;
> + static const char *envp[] = { "EVENT=offline", NULL };
>  
>   /*
>* acpi_container_offline() calls this for all of the container's
> @@ -126,7 +127,7 @@ bool acpi_scan_is_offline(struct acpi_device *adev, bool 
> uevent)
>   list_for_each_entry(pn, >physical_node_list, node)
>   if (device_supports_offline(pn->dev) && !pn->dev->offline) {
>   if (uevent)
> - kobject_uevent(>dev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE);
> + kobject_uevent_env(>dev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE, 
> envp);
>  
>   offline = false;
>   break;
> 

This causes build issues when applied, please fix.

Thanks!




Re: [PATCH] ACPI / scan: Send the change uevent with offine environmental data

2018-03-02 Thread joeyli
On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 03:00:59PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 02-03-18 14:35:08, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> > In current design of ACPI container offline, Kernel emits
> > KOBJ_CHANGE uevent to user space to indidate that the ejection of
> > the container was triggered by platform. (caa73ea15 patch)
> > 
> > A pure KOBJ_CHANGE uevent is not enough for user space to identify
> > the purpose. For example, a "udevadm trigger" command can also
> > be used to emit change event to all udev rules. A udev rule can not
> > identify that the event is from kernel for offline or from udevadm
> > for other purpose. Then the offline action in udev rule may also be
> > triggered by udevadm tool.
> > 
> > So, similar to the change uevent of dock, kernel sends the
> > KOBJ_CHANGE uevent with a offline environmental data to indicate
> > purpose. It's useful by udev rule for using ENV{EVENT} filter.
> 
> Looks reasonable to me. I have also tested this on Huawei Kunlun server
> which hits the offline & online storm as a result of udevadm triggered
> and a container udev rule which hooks into change event and offlines
> all devices attached to the container. This patch allowed the udev rule
> to be more targeted at the offline event.
> 
> > Cc: Michal Hocko  
> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki"  
> > Cc: Len Brown  
> > Signed-off-by: "Lee, Chun-Yi" 
> 
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko 
> Tested-by: Michal Hocko 
>

Thank you for review and testing.

Joey Lee
 
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/scan.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > index 8e63d93..f6dca9b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ bool acpi_scan_is_offline(struct acpi_device *adev, 
> > bool uevent)
> >  {
> > struct acpi_device_physical_node *pn;
> > bool offline = true;
> > +   static const char *envp[] = { "EVENT=offline", NULL };
> >  
> > /*
> >  * acpi_container_offline() calls this for all of the container's
> > @@ -126,7 +127,7 @@ bool acpi_scan_is_offline(struct acpi_device *adev, 
> > bool uevent)
> > list_for_each_entry(pn, >physical_node_list, node)
> > if (device_supports_offline(pn->dev) && !pn->dev->offline) {
> > if (uevent)
> > -   kobject_uevent(>dev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE);
> > +   kobject_uevent_env(>dev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE, 
> > envp);
> >  
> > offline = false;
> > break;
> > -- 
> > 2.10.2
> 
> -- 
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs


Re: [PATCH] ACPI / scan: Send the change uevent with offine environmental data

2018-03-02 Thread joeyli
On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 03:00:59PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 02-03-18 14:35:08, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> > In current design of ACPI container offline, Kernel emits
> > KOBJ_CHANGE uevent to user space to indidate that the ejection of
> > the container was triggered by platform. (caa73ea15 patch)
> > 
> > A pure KOBJ_CHANGE uevent is not enough for user space to identify
> > the purpose. For example, a "udevadm trigger" command can also
> > be used to emit change event to all udev rules. A udev rule can not
> > identify that the event is from kernel for offline or from udevadm
> > for other purpose. Then the offline action in udev rule may also be
> > triggered by udevadm tool.
> > 
> > So, similar to the change uevent of dock, kernel sends the
> > KOBJ_CHANGE uevent with a offline environmental data to indicate
> > purpose. It's useful by udev rule for using ENV{EVENT} filter.
> 
> Looks reasonable to me. I have also tested this on Huawei Kunlun server
> which hits the offline & online storm as a result of udevadm triggered
> and a container udev rule which hooks into change event and offlines
> all devices attached to the container. This patch allowed the udev rule
> to be more targeted at the offline event.
> 
> > Cc: Michal Hocko  
> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki"  
> > Cc: Len Brown  
> > Signed-off-by: "Lee, Chun-Yi" 
> 
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko 
> Tested-by: Michal Hocko 
>

Thank you for review and testing.

Joey Lee
 
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/scan.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > index 8e63d93..f6dca9b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ bool acpi_scan_is_offline(struct acpi_device *adev, 
> > bool uevent)
> >  {
> > struct acpi_device_physical_node *pn;
> > bool offline = true;
> > +   static const char *envp[] = { "EVENT=offline", NULL };
> >  
> > /*
> >  * acpi_container_offline() calls this for all of the container's
> > @@ -126,7 +127,7 @@ bool acpi_scan_is_offline(struct acpi_device *adev, 
> > bool uevent)
> > list_for_each_entry(pn, >physical_node_list, node)
> > if (device_supports_offline(pn->dev) && !pn->dev->offline) {
> > if (uevent)
> > -   kobject_uevent(>dev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE);
> > +   kobject_uevent_env(>dev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE, 
> > envp);
> >  
> > offline = false;
> > break;
> > -- 
> > 2.10.2
> 
> -- 
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs


Re: [PATCH] ACPI / scan: Send the change uevent with offine environmental data

2018-03-02 Thread Michal Hocko
On Fri 02-03-18 14:35:08, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> In current design of ACPI container offline, Kernel emits
> KOBJ_CHANGE uevent to user space to indidate that the ejection of
> the container was triggered by platform. (caa73ea15 patch)
> 
> A pure KOBJ_CHANGE uevent is not enough for user space to identify
> the purpose. For example, a "udevadm trigger" command can also
> be used to emit change event to all udev rules. A udev rule can not
> identify that the event is from kernel for offline or from udevadm
> for other purpose. Then the offline action in udev rule may also be
> triggered by udevadm tool.
> 
> So, similar to the change uevent of dock, kernel sends the
> KOBJ_CHANGE uevent with a offline environmental data to indicate
> purpose. It's useful by udev rule for using ENV{EVENT} filter.

Looks reasonable to me. I have also tested this on Huawei Kunlun server
which hits the offline & online storm as a result of udevadm triggered
and a container udev rule which hooks into change event and offlines
all devices attached to the container. This patch allowed the udev rule
to be more targeted at the offline event.

> Cc: Michal Hocko  
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki"  
> Cc: Len Brown  
> Signed-off-by: "Lee, Chun-Yi" 

Acked-by: Michal Hocko 
Tested-by: Michal Hocko 

> ---
>  drivers/acpi/scan.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index 8e63d93..f6dca9b 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ bool acpi_scan_is_offline(struct acpi_device *adev, bool 
> uevent)
>  {
>   struct acpi_device_physical_node *pn;
>   bool offline = true;
> + static const char *envp[] = { "EVENT=offline", NULL };
>  
>   /*
>* acpi_container_offline() calls this for all of the container's
> @@ -126,7 +127,7 @@ bool acpi_scan_is_offline(struct acpi_device *adev, bool 
> uevent)
>   list_for_each_entry(pn, >physical_node_list, node)
>   if (device_supports_offline(pn->dev) && !pn->dev->offline) {
>   if (uevent)
> - kobject_uevent(>dev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE);
> + kobject_uevent_env(>dev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE, 
> envp);
>  
>   offline = false;
>   break;
> -- 
> 2.10.2

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs


Re: [PATCH] ACPI / scan: Send the change uevent with offine environmental data

2018-03-02 Thread Michal Hocko
On Fri 02-03-18 14:35:08, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> In current design of ACPI container offline, Kernel emits
> KOBJ_CHANGE uevent to user space to indidate that the ejection of
> the container was triggered by platform. (caa73ea15 patch)
> 
> A pure KOBJ_CHANGE uevent is not enough for user space to identify
> the purpose. For example, a "udevadm trigger" command can also
> be used to emit change event to all udev rules. A udev rule can not
> identify that the event is from kernel for offline or from udevadm
> for other purpose. Then the offline action in udev rule may also be
> triggered by udevadm tool.
> 
> So, similar to the change uevent of dock, kernel sends the
> KOBJ_CHANGE uevent with a offline environmental data to indicate
> purpose. It's useful by udev rule for using ENV{EVENT} filter.

Looks reasonable to me. I have also tested this on Huawei Kunlun server
which hits the offline & online storm as a result of udevadm triggered
and a container udev rule which hooks into change event and offlines
all devices attached to the container. This patch allowed the udev rule
to be more targeted at the offline event.

> Cc: Michal Hocko  
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki"  
> Cc: Len Brown  
> Signed-off-by: "Lee, Chun-Yi" 

Acked-by: Michal Hocko 
Tested-by: Michal Hocko 

> ---
>  drivers/acpi/scan.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index 8e63d93..f6dca9b 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ bool acpi_scan_is_offline(struct acpi_device *adev, bool 
> uevent)
>  {
>   struct acpi_device_physical_node *pn;
>   bool offline = true;
> + static const char *envp[] = { "EVENT=offline", NULL };
>  
>   /*
>* acpi_container_offline() calls this for all of the container's
> @@ -126,7 +127,7 @@ bool acpi_scan_is_offline(struct acpi_device *adev, bool 
> uevent)
>   list_for_each_entry(pn, >physical_node_list, node)
>   if (device_supports_offline(pn->dev) && !pn->dev->offline) {
>   if (uevent)
> - kobject_uevent(>dev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE);
> + kobject_uevent_env(>dev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE, 
> envp);
>  
>   offline = false;
>   break;
> -- 
> 2.10.2

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs