Re: [PATCH] Add a non-blocking interface to the I2C code, part 1

Greg KH wrote: On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 01:58:51PM -0600, Corey Minyard wrote: This patch reorganizes the I2C SMBus formatting code to make it more suitable for the upcoming non-blocking changes. You are changing too much stuff here to claim it's just a reorganization: - variable name

Re: [PATCH] Add a non-blocking interface to the I2C code, part 1

Greg KH wrote: On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 01:58:51PM -0600, Corey Minyard wrote: This patch reorganizes the I2C SMBus formatting code to make it more suitable for the upcoming non-blocking changes. You are changing too much stuff here to claim it's just a reorganization: - variable name

Re: [PATCH] Add a non-blocking interface to the I2C code, part 1

On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 01:58:51PM -0600, Corey Minyard wrote: > This patch reorganizes the I2C SMBus formatting code to make it more > suitable for the upcoming non-blocking changes. You are changing too much stuff here to claim it's just a reorganization: - variable name changes for no

Re: [PATCH] Add a non-blocking interface to the I2C code, part 1

On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 01:58:51PM -0600, Corey Minyard wrote: This patch reorganizes the I2C SMBus formatting code to make it more suitable for the upcoming non-blocking changes. You are changing too much stuff here to claim it's just a reorganization: - variable name changes for no