On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 01:25:56AM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Lesson learned, your original script should remain as is. :)
Ok, then please send Julia's script as a separate patch and then in the
EDAC patch, reference the path to that coccinelle patch so that it is
clear what has been used
On 07/23/2017 12:53 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jul 2017, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Hi Julia,
On 07/23/2017 12:07 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jul 2017, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Hi Julia, Borislav,
On 07/22/2017 11:22 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Hi all,
On 07/22/
On Sun, 23 Jul 2017, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi Julia,
>
> On 07/23/2017 12:07 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 22 Jul 2017, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Julia, Borislav,
> > >
> > > On 07/22/2017 11:22 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > On
Hi Julia,
On 07/23/2017 12:07 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jul 2017, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Hi Julia, Borislav,
On 07/22/2017 11:22 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Hi all,
On 07/22/2017 01:36 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 10:08:12PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote
On Sat, 22 Jul 2017, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi Julia, Borislav,
>
> On 07/22/2017 11:22 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On 07/22/2017 01:36 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 10:08:12PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > > Someone pointed out that the
Hi Julia, Borislav,
On 07/22/2017 11:22 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Hi all,
On 07/22/2017 01:36 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 10:08:12PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
Someone pointed out that the rule is probably not OK when the address of
the static variable is taken, be
Hi all,
On 07/22/2017 01:36 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 10:08:12PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
Someone pointed out that the rule is probably not OK when the address of
the static variable is taken, because then it is likely being used as
permanent storage.
Makes sense to
On Sat, 22 Jul 2017, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 10:08:12PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > Someone pointed out that the rule is probably not OK when the address of
> > the static variable is taken, because then it is likely being used as
> > permanent storage.
>
> Makes sens
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 10:08:12PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Someone pointed out that the rule is probably not OK when the address of
> the static variable is taken, because then it is likely being used as
> permanent storage.
Makes sense to me.
> An improved rule is:
Do you think it is worth
On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 04:44:40PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > Remove unnecessary static on local variable _type_.
> > Such variable is initialized before being used,
> > on every execution path throughout the function.
> > The static has n
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 04:44:40PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Remove unnecessary static on local variable _type_.
> Such variable is initialized before being used,
> on every execution path throughout the function.
> The static has no benefit and, removing it reduces
> the code size.
>
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
