Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: mark framebuffer as Orphan

James Simmons wrote: ... If you start doing this, there are a lot more entries that need to be changed... Which of Supported/Maintained/"Odd Fixes" is written doesn't matter in practice. What matters is that James' email address gets into the entry so that patches and bug reports reach

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: mark framebuffer as Orphan

> > > Alot of patches have been flowing into the layer. > > > > So would you like to leave it as Maintained or change it to > > "Odd Fixes"? (Maintained => a maintainer) From the MAINTAINTERS file: > > > > Supported: Someone is actually paid to look after this. > > Maintained:

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: mark framebuffer as Orphan

Alot of patches have been flowing into the layer. So would you like to leave it as Maintained or change it to Odd Fixes? (Maintained = a maintainer) From the MAINTAINTERS file: Supported: Someone is actually paid to look after this. Maintained: Someone actually

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: mark framebuffer as Orphan

James Simmons wrote: ... If you start doing this, there are a lot more entries that need to be changed... Which of Supported/Maintained/Odd Fixes is written doesn't matter in practice. What matters is that James' email address gets into the entry so that patches and bug reports reach

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: mark framebuffer as Orphan

On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 03:05:26PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:26:10 + (GMT) James Simmons wrote: > > > > > I wouldn't say it orphan. I just can't spend 8 hours a day on it. > > Alot of patches have been flowing into the layer. > > So would you like to leave it as

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: mark framebuffer as Orphan

On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 03:05:26PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:26:10 + (GMT) James Simmons wrote: I wouldn't say it orphan. I just can't spend 8 hours a day on it. Alot of patches have been flowing into the layer. So would you like to leave it as Maintained

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: mark framebuffer as Orphan

On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:25:49 -0800 Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Are we ready to do this? > I'd love for Tony to return, but he's been missing for awhile now. > > So this give us the following major areas that are marked as Orphan: > >

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: mark framebuffer as Orphan

On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:26:10 + (GMT) James Simmons wrote: > > I wouldn't say it orphan. I just can't spend 8 hours a day on it. > Alot of patches have been flowing into the layer. So would you like to leave it as Maintained or change it to "Odd Fixes"? (Maintained => a maintainer) From

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: mark framebuffer as Orphan

I wouldn't say it orphan. I just can't spend 8 hours a day on it. Alot of patches have been flowing into the layer. On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote: > From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Are we ready to do this? > I'd love for Tony to return, but he's been missing for awhile

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: mark framebuffer as Orphan

I wouldn't say it orphan. I just can't spend 8 hours a day on it. Alot of patches have been flowing into the layer. On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote: From: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] Are we ready to do this? I'd love for Tony to return, but he's been missing for awhile now.

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: mark framebuffer as Orphan

On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:26:10 + (GMT) James Simmons wrote: I wouldn't say it orphan. I just can't spend 8 hours a day on it. Alot of patches have been flowing into the layer. So would you like to leave it as Maintained or change it to Odd Fixes? (Maintained = a maintainer) From the

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: mark framebuffer as Orphan

On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:25:49 -0800 Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] Are we ready to do this? I'd love for Tony to return, but he's been missing for awhile now. So this give us the following major areas that are marked as Orphan: Firmware loader