On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> > I take it it's a quest for a clean compilation with no warnings reported,
> > as the message is otherwise harmless and correct code is produced here.
> >
> > Some of the systems affected are not necessarily fast (e.g. clocked at
> > 12MHz), so I wo
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:30:25PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> > When expanding the la or dla pseudo-instruction in a delay slot the GNU
> > assembler will complain should the pseudo-instruction expand to multiple
> > actual instructions, since only the first of them will be in the delay
> >
On Fri, 2 Sep 2016, Paul Burton wrote:
> When expanding the la or dla pseudo-instruction in a delay slot the GNU
> assembler will complain should the pseudo-instruction expand to multiple
> actual instructions, since only the first of them will be in the delay
> slot leading to the pseudo-instruct
3 matches
Mail list logo