Re: [PATCH] MIPS: dec: Avoid la pseudo-instruction in delay slots

2016-10-02 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > I take it it's a quest for a clean compilation with no warnings reported, > > as the message is otherwise harmless and correct code is produced here. > > > > Some of the systems affected are not necessarily fast (e.g. clocked at > > 12MHz), so I wo

Re: [PATCH] MIPS: dec: Avoid la pseudo-instruction in delay slots

2016-09-20 Thread Ralf Baechle
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:30:25PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > When expanding the la or dla pseudo-instruction in a delay slot the GNU > > assembler will complain should the pseudo-instruction expand to multiple > > actual instructions, since only the first of them will be in the delay > >

Re: [PATCH] MIPS: dec: Avoid la pseudo-instruction in delay slots

2016-09-19 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Fri, 2 Sep 2016, Paul Burton wrote: > When expanding the la or dla pseudo-instruction in a delay slot the GNU > assembler will complain should the pseudo-instruction expand to multiple > actual instructions, since only the first of them will be in the delay > slot leading to the pseudo-instruct