Re: [PATCH] Revert "dmaengine: pxa_dma: add support for legacy transition"
Arnd Bergmann writes: > On Tuesday, October 18, 2016 8:46:32 AM CEST Robert Jarzmik wrote: >> This reverts commit c91134d9194478144ba579ca6efeddf628055650. >> >> The conversion of the pxa architecture is now finished for all >> drivers, so this functions has fullfilled its purpose and can >> now be removed. >> >> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik > > Nice! > > That reminds me, do you have plans to work on the conversion away from > IORESOURCE_DMA and pxad_filter_fn towards the dma_slave_map interface? > > I see that all pxa drivers already use dma_request_slave_channel_compat, > so this should be fairly straightforward to do, changing only the > driver and the arch/arm/mach-pxa/devices.c file. I didn't so far, as I wasn't aware of this interface, but I'll gladly put that on my todo list. Cheers. -- Robert
Re: [PATCH] Revert "dmaengine: pxa_dma: add support for legacy transition"
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 08:46:32AM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > This reverts commit c91134d9194478144ba579ca6efeddf628055650. > > The conversion of the pxa architecture is now finished for all > drivers, so this functions has fullfilled its purpose and can > now be removed. Applied, thanks -- ~Vinod
Re: [PATCH] Revert "dmaengine: pxa_dma: add support for legacy transition"
On Tuesday, October 18, 2016 8:46:32 AM CEST Robert Jarzmik wrote: > This reverts commit c91134d9194478144ba579ca6efeddf628055650. > > The conversion of the pxa architecture is now finished for all > drivers, so this functions has fullfilled its purpose and can > now be removed. > > Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik Nice! That reminds me, do you have plans to work on the conversion away from IORESOURCE_DMA and pxad_filter_fn towards the dma_slave_map interface? I see that all pxa drivers already use dma_request_slave_channel_compat, so this should be fairly straightforward to do, changing only the driver and the arch/arm/mach-pxa/devices.c file. Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann
