Re: [PATCH] arm: kgdb: fix NUMREGBYTES so that gdb_regs[] is the correct size

2018-04-10 Thread Sasha Levin
Hi, [This is an automated email] This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag, fixing commit: 834b2964b7ab kgdb,arm: fix register dump. The bot has also determined it's probably a bug fixing patch. (score: 97.9682) The bot has tested the following trees: v4.16.1, v4.15.16,

Re: [PATCH] arm: kgdb: fix NUMREGBYTES so that gdb_regs[] is the correct size

2018-04-06 Thread David Rivshin
On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 14:49:22 +0100 Daniel Thompson wrote: > On 06/04/18 14:25, Daniel Thompson wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 04:09:16PM -0400, David Rivshin wrote: > >> From: David Rivshin > >> > >> NUMREGBYTES (which is used as the size for gdb_regs[]) is incorrectly based > >> on DBG_MAX

Re: [PATCH] arm: kgdb: fix NUMREGBYTES so that gdb_regs[] is the correct size

2018-04-06 Thread Daniel Thompson
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 04:09:16PM -0400, David Rivshin wrote: > From: David Rivshin > > NUMREGBYTES (which is used as the size for gdb_regs[]) is incorrectly based > on DBG_MAX_REG_NUM instead of GDB_MAX_REGS. DBG_MAX_REG_NUM is the number > of total registers, while GDB_MAX_REGS is the number o

Re: [PATCH] arm: kgdb: fix NUMREGBYTES so that gdb_regs[] is the correct size

2018-04-06 Thread Daniel Thompson
On 06/04/18 14:25, Daniel Thompson wrote: On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 04:09:16PM -0400, David Rivshin wrote: From: David Rivshin NUMREGBYTES (which is used as the size for gdb_regs[]) is incorrectly based on DBG_MAX_REG_NUM instead of GDB_MAX_REGS. DBG_MAX_REG_NUM is the number of total registers,

Re: [PATCH] arm: kgdb: fix NUMREGBYTES so that gdb_regs[] is the correct size

2018-04-05 Thread Rabin Vincent
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 04:09:16PM -0400, David Rivshin wrote: > From: David Rivshin > > NUMREGBYTES (which is used as the size for gdb_regs[]) is incorrectly based > on DBG_MAX_REG_NUM instead of GDB_MAX_REGS. DBG_MAX_REG_NUM is the number > of total registers, while GDB_MAX_REGS is the number o