On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 07:00:17PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 27 July 2014 20:40, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >>
> >> > Btw. the current solution is already faulty - even with the fix.
> >> > There are no support for make C=2 arch/.../crypto/
> >> >
> >>
> >> So can you elaborate on how it is
On 27 July 2014 20:40, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>>
>> > Btw. the current solution is already faulty - even with the fix.
>> > There are no support for make C=2 arch/.../crypto/
>> >
>>
>> So can you elaborate on how it is faulty?
>
> When you run "make C=2 arch/.../crypto/" then sparse shall be run
>
On 27 July 2014 20:40, Sam Ravnborg s...@ravnborg.org wrote:
Btw. the current solution is already faulty - even with the fix.
There are no support for make C=2 arch/.../crypto/
So can you elaborate on how it is faulty?
When you run make C=2 arch/.../crypto/ then sparse shall be run
for
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 07:00:17PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 27 July 2014 20:40, Sam Ravnborg s...@ravnborg.org wrote:
Btw. the current solution is already faulty - even with the fix.
There are no support for make C=2 arch/.../crypto/
So can you elaborate on how it is faulty?
>
> > Btw. the current solution is already faulty - even with the fix.
> > There are no support for make C=2 arch/.../crypto/
> >
>
> So can you elaborate on how it is faulty?
When you run "make C=2 arch/.../crypto/" then sparse shall be run
for all .c files also if they are already built.
But
Btw. the current solution is already faulty - even with the fix.
There are no support for make C=2 arch/.../crypto/
So can you elaborate on how it is faulty?
When you run make C=2 arch/.../crypto/ then sparse shall be run
for all .c files also if they are already built.
But due to the
On 24 July 2014 22:45, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 09:25:13PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 24 July 2014 18:12, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 04:24:48PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> >> On 24 July 2014 16:18, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> >> > On 24 July
On 24 July 2014 22:45, Sam Ravnborg s...@ravnborg.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 09:25:13PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 24 July 2014 18:12, Sam Ravnborg s...@ravnborg.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 04:24:48PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 24 July 2014 16:18, Ard Biesheuvel
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 09:25:13PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 24 July 2014 18:12, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 04:24:48PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> On 24 July 2014 16:18, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> > On 24 July 2014 15:40, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >> >> Ard
On 24 July 2014 18:12, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 04:24:48PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 24 July 2014 16:18, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> > On 24 July 2014 15:40, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> >> Ard Biesheuvel writes:
>> >>
>> >>> On 24 July 2014 15:26, Andreas Schwab wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 04:24:48PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 24 July 2014 16:18, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On 24 July 2014 15:40, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >> Ard Biesheuvel writes:
> >>
> >>> On 24 July 2014 15:26, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> You are not using CONFIG_MODVERSIONS.
>
On 24 July 2014 16:18, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 24 July 2014 15:40, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Ard Biesheuvel writes:
>>
>>> On 24 July 2014 15:26, Andreas Schwab wrote:
You are not using CONFIG_MODVERSIONS.
>>>
>>> I am
>>
>> No, you aren't, since you say that your .cmd contains a
On 24 July 2014 15:40, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Ard Biesheuvel writes:
>
>> On 24 July 2014 15:26, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>> You are not using CONFIG_MODVERSIONS.
>>>
>>
>> I am
>
> No, you aren't, since you say that your .cmd contains a command to
> create aes-glue-ce.o, which with
Ard Biesheuvel writes:
> On 24 July 2014 15:26, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> You are not using CONFIG_MODVERSIONS.
>>
>
> I am
No, you aren't, since you say that your .cmd contains a command to
create aes-glue-ce.o, which with CONFIG_MODVERSIONS it doesn't.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE
On 24 July 2014 15:26, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> You are not using CONFIG_MODVERSIONS.
>
I am
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please
You are not using CONFIG_MODVERSIONS.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the
On 24 July 2014 14:35, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 24 July 2014 14:29, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Ard Biesheuvel writes:
>>
>>> On 30 June 2014 15:56, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Ard Biesheuvel writes:
> Out of curiosity, how did you trigger this failure? I have build this
> code
On 24 July 2014 14:29, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Ard Biesheuvel writes:
>
>> On 30 June 2014 15:56, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>> Ard Biesheuvel writes:
>>>
Out of curiosity, how did you trigger this failure? I have build this
code numerous times (and so have others) and I have never seen
Ard Biesheuvel writes:
> On 30 June 2014 15:56, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Ard Biesheuvel writes:
>>
>>> Out of curiosity, how did you trigger this failure? I have build this
>>> code numerous times (and so have others) and I have never seen this
>>> failure.
>>
>> Did you ever start with a
Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org writes:
On 30 June 2014 15:56, Andreas Schwab sch...@suse.de wrote:
Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org writes:
Out of curiosity, how did you trigger this failure? I have build this
code numerous times (and so have others) and I have never seen
On 24 July 2014 14:29, Andreas Schwab sch...@suse.de wrote:
Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org writes:
On 30 June 2014 15:56, Andreas Schwab sch...@suse.de wrote:
Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org writes:
Out of curiosity, how did you trigger this failure? I have build this
On 24 July 2014 14:35, Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org wrote:
On 24 July 2014 14:29, Andreas Schwab sch...@suse.de wrote:
Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org writes:
On 30 June 2014 15:56, Andreas Schwab sch...@suse.de wrote:
Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org writes:
You are not using CONFIG_MODVERSIONS.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
And now for something completely different.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body
On 24 July 2014 15:26, Andreas Schwab sch...@suse.de wrote:
You are not using CONFIG_MODVERSIONS.
I am
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org writes:
On 24 July 2014 15:26, Andreas Schwab sch...@suse.de wrote:
You are not using CONFIG_MODVERSIONS.
I am
No, you aren't, since you say that your .cmd contains a command to
create aes-glue-ce.o, which with CONFIG_MODVERSIONS it doesn't.
On 24 July 2014 15:40, Andreas Schwab sch...@suse.de wrote:
Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org writes:
On 24 July 2014 15:26, Andreas Schwab sch...@suse.de wrote:
You are not using CONFIG_MODVERSIONS.
I am
No, you aren't, since you say that your .cmd contains a command to
create
On 24 July 2014 16:18, Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org wrote:
On 24 July 2014 15:40, Andreas Schwab sch...@suse.de wrote:
Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org writes:
On 24 July 2014 15:26, Andreas Schwab sch...@suse.de wrote:
You are not using CONFIG_MODVERSIONS.
I am
No,
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 04:24:48PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 24 July 2014 16:18, Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org wrote:
On 24 July 2014 15:40, Andreas Schwab sch...@suse.de wrote:
Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org writes:
On 24 July 2014 15:26, Andreas Schwab
On 24 July 2014 18:12, Sam Ravnborg s...@ravnborg.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 04:24:48PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 24 July 2014 16:18, Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org wrote:
On 24 July 2014 15:40, Andreas Schwab sch...@suse.de wrote:
Ard Biesheuvel
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 09:25:13PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 24 July 2014 18:12, Sam Ravnborg s...@ravnborg.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 04:24:48PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 24 July 2014 16:18, Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org wrote:
On 24 July 2014 15:40, Andreas
On 30 June 2014 15:56, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Ard Biesheuvel writes:
>
>> Out of curiosity, how did you trigger this failure? I have build this
>> code numerous times (and so have others) and I have never seen this
>> failure.
>
> Did you ever start with a clean tree?
>
Yep, building both
Ard Biesheuvel writes:
> Out of curiosity, how did you trigger this failure? I have build this
> code numerous times (and so have others) and I have never seen this
> failure.
Did you ever start with a clean tree?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint =
On 30 June 2014 15:14, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> This fixes the following build failure:
>
> CC [M] arch/arm64/crypto/aes-glue-ce.o
> ld: cannot find arch/arm64/crypto/aes-glue-ce.o: No such file or directory
> scripts/Makefile.build:393: recipe for target
> 'arch/arm64/crypto/aes-ce-blk.o'
On 30 June 2014 15:14, Andreas Schwab sch...@suse.de wrote:
This fixes the following build failure:
CC [M] arch/arm64/crypto/aes-glue-ce.o
ld: cannot find arch/arm64/crypto/aes-glue-ce.o: No such file or directory
scripts/Makefile.build:393: recipe for target
Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org writes:
Out of curiosity, how did you trigger this failure? I have build this
code numerous times (and so have others) and I have never seen this
failure.
Did you ever start with a clean tree?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
On 30 June 2014 15:56, Andreas Schwab sch...@suse.de wrote:
Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org writes:
Out of curiosity, how did you trigger this failure? I have build this
code numerous times (and so have others) and I have never seen this
failure.
Did you ever start with a clean
36 matches
Mail list logo
