On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:09:29PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Thierry Reding
> wrote:
>
> > it seems like at least BACKLIGHT_LP8788 is missing a corresponding
> > dependency as well.
> >
> > I have applied Sascha's patch to remove the obsolete HAVE_PWM
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:09:29PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
it seems like at least BACKLIGHT_LP8788 is missing a corresponding
dependency as well.
I have applied Sascha's patch to remove the obsolete
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> it seems like at least BACKLIGHT_LP8788 is missing a corresponding
> dependency as well.
>
> I have applied Sascha's patch to remove the obsolete HAVE_PWM symbol,
> and this will fix at least the build issues. However it will also cause
>
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 01:57:14PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> In some compilations the LM3630A and LP855X backlight drivers
> fail like this:
>
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `lm3630a_pwm_ctrl':
> drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c:168: undefined reference to `pwm_config'
>
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 01:57:14PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
In some compilations the LM3630A and LP855X backlight drivers
fail like this:
drivers/built-in.o: In function `lm3630a_pwm_ctrl':
drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c:168: undefined reference to `pwm_config'
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
it seems like at least BACKLIGHT_LP8788 is missing a corresponding
dependency as well.
I have applied Sascha's patch to remove the obsolete HAVE_PWM symbol,
and this will fix at least the build issues. However
On Friday 07 February 2014, Jingoo Han wrote:
> How about the following?
>
> [PATCH 1/7] ARM: pxa: don't select HAVE_PWM
> [PATCH 2/7] ARM: lpc32xx: don't select HAVE_PWM
> [PATCH 3/7] ARM: remove HAVE_PWM config option
> [PATCH 4/7] MIPS: jz4740: don't select HAVE_PWM
> [PATCH 5/7]
On Friday 07 February 2014, Jingoo Han wrote:
How about the following?
[PATCH 1/7] ARM: pxa: don't select HAVE_PWM
[PATCH 2/7] ARM: lpc32xx: don't select HAVE_PWM
[PATCH 3/7] ARM: remove HAVE_PWM config option
[PATCH 4/7] MIPS: jz4740: don't select HAVE_PWM
[PATCH 5/7] Input:
On Friday, February 07, 2014 1:08 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 06 February 2014, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > In the case of "CONFIG_HAVE_PWM=y && CONFIG_PWM=n", it makes
> > the problem.
> >
> > The HAVE_PWM symbol is only for legacy platforms that provide
> > the PWM API without using the
On Thursday 06 February 2014 17:08:05 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> Finally, I have recently encountered a couple of drivers
> (BACKLIGHT_LM3630A, BACKLIGHT_LP855X, BACKLIGHT_LP8788) that use
> the PWM interfaces but are missing a 'depends on PWM'. This is
> strictly speaking a different problem, but
On Thursday 06 February 2014, Jingoo Han wrote:
> In the case of "CONFIG_HAVE_PWM=y && CONFIG_PWM=n", it makes
> the problem.
>
> The HAVE_PWM symbol is only for legacy platforms that provide
> the PWM API without using the generic framework. PXA looks to
> use the generic PWM framework. Then,
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Jingoo Han wrote:
> In the case of "CONFIG_HAVE_PWM=y && CONFIG_PWM=n", it makes
> the problem.
>
> The HAVE_PWM symbol is only for legacy platforms that provide
> the PWM API without using the generic framework. PXA looks to
> use the generic PWM framework. Then,
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Jingoo Han jg1@samsung.com wrote:
In the case of CONFIG_HAVE_PWM=y CONFIG_PWM=n, it makes
the problem.
The HAVE_PWM symbol is only for legacy platforms that provide
the PWM API without using the generic framework. PXA looks to
use the generic PWM
On Thursday 06 February 2014, Jingoo Han wrote:
In the case of CONFIG_HAVE_PWM=y CONFIG_PWM=n, it makes
the problem.
The HAVE_PWM symbol is only for legacy platforms that provide
the PWM API without using the generic framework. PXA looks to
use the generic PWM framework. Then, how about
On Thursday 06 February 2014 17:08:05 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Finally, I have recently encountered a couple of drivers
(BACKLIGHT_LM3630A, BACKLIGHT_LP855X, BACKLIGHT_LP8788) that use
the PWM interfaces but are missing a 'depends on PWM'. This is
strictly speaking a different problem, but we
On Friday, February 07, 2014 1:08 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 06 February 2014, Jingoo Han wrote:
In the case of CONFIG_HAVE_PWM=y CONFIG_PWM=n, it makes
the problem.
The HAVE_PWM symbol is only for legacy platforms that provide
the PWM API without using the generic framework.
On Thursday, February 06, 2014 3:50 PM, Jingoo Han wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 05, 2014 5:58 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:01 AM, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, February 04, 2014 9:57 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > >>
> > >> In some compilations the LM3630A and
On Wednesday, February 05, 2014 5:58 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:01 AM, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > On Tuesday, February 04, 2014 9:57 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >>
> >> In some compilations the LM3630A and LP855X backlight drivers
> >> fail like this:
> >>
> >>
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:01 AM, Jingoo Han wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 04, 2014 9:57 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>
>> In some compilations the LM3630A and LP855X backlight drivers
>> fail like this:
>>
>> drivers/built-in.o: In function `lm3630a_pwm_ctrl':
>>
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:01 AM, Jingoo Han jg1@samsung.com wrote:
On Tuesday, February 04, 2014 9:57 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
In some compilations the LM3630A and LP855X backlight drivers
fail like this:
drivers/built-in.o: In function `lm3630a_pwm_ctrl':
On Wednesday, February 05, 2014 5:58 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:01 AM, Jingoo Han jg1@samsung.com wrote:
On Tuesday, February 04, 2014 9:57 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
In some compilations the LM3630A and LP855X backlight drivers
fail like this:
On Thursday, February 06, 2014 3:50 PM, Jingoo Han wrote:
On Wednesday, February 05, 2014 5:58 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:01 AM, Jingoo Han jg1@samsung.com wrote:
On Tuesday, February 04, 2014 9:57 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
In some compilations the LM3630A and
On Tuesday, February 04, 2014 9:57 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> In some compilations the LM3630A and LP855X backlight drivers
> fail like this:
>
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `lm3630a_pwm_ctrl':
> drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c:168: undefined reference to `pwm_config'
>
On Tuesday, February 04, 2014 9:57 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
In some compilations the LM3630A and LP855X backlight drivers
fail like this:
drivers/built-in.o: In function `lm3630a_pwm_ctrl':
drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c:168: undefined reference to `pwm_config'
24 matches
Mail list logo
