Re: [PATCH] base: power: domain: Replace mdelay with msleep

2018-02-12 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 12 February 2018 at 11:38, Lucas Stach wrote: > Am Freitag, den 09.02.2018, 14:58 +0100 schrieb Ulf Hansson: >> On 26 January 2018 at 09:38, Jia-Ju Bai >> wrote: >> > After checking all possible call chains to genpd_dev_pm_detach() >> > and >> >

Re: [PATCH] base: power: domain: Replace mdelay with msleep

2018-02-12 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 12 February 2018 at 11:38, Lucas Stach wrote: > Am Freitag, den 09.02.2018, 14:58 +0100 schrieb Ulf Hansson: >> On 26 January 2018 at 09:38, Jia-Ju Bai >> wrote: >> > After checking all possible call chains to genpd_dev_pm_detach() >> > and >> > genpd_dev_pm_attach() here, >> > my tool finds

Re: [PATCH] base: power: domain: Replace mdelay with msleep

2018-02-12 Thread Lucas Stach
Am Freitag, den 09.02.2018, 14:58 +0100 schrieb Ulf Hansson: > On 26 January 2018 at 09:38, Jia-Ju Bai > wrote: > > After checking all possible call chains to genpd_dev_pm_detach() > > and > > genpd_dev_pm_attach() here, > > my tool finds that these functions are never

Re: [PATCH] base: power: domain: Replace mdelay with msleep

2018-02-12 Thread Lucas Stach
Am Freitag, den 09.02.2018, 14:58 +0100 schrieb Ulf Hansson: > On 26 January 2018 at 09:38, Jia-Ju Bai > wrote: > > After checking all possible call chains to genpd_dev_pm_detach() > > and > > genpd_dev_pm_attach() here, > > my tool finds that these functions are never called in atomic > >

Re: [PATCH] base: power: domain: Replace mdelay with msleep

2018-02-09 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 26 January 2018 at 09:38, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > After checking all possible call chains to genpd_dev_pm_detach() and > genpd_dev_pm_attach() here, > my tool finds that these functions are never called in atomic context, > namely never in an interrupt handler or holding a

Re: [PATCH] base: power: domain: Replace mdelay with msleep

2018-02-09 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 26 January 2018 at 09:38, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > After checking all possible call chains to genpd_dev_pm_detach() and > genpd_dev_pm_attach() here, > my tool finds that these functions are never called in atomic context, > namely never in an interrupt handler or holding a spinlock. > Thus mdelay

Re: [PATCH] base: power: domain: Replace mdelay with msleep

2018-02-09 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, January 26, 2018 9:38:19 AM CET Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > After checking all possible call chains to genpd_dev_pm_detach() and > genpd_dev_pm_attach() here, > my tool finds that these functions are never called in atomic context, > namely never in an interrupt handler or holding a spinlock. >

Re: [PATCH] base: power: domain: Replace mdelay with msleep

2018-02-09 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, January 26, 2018 9:38:19 AM CET Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > After checking all possible call chains to genpd_dev_pm_detach() and > genpd_dev_pm_attach() here, > my tool finds that these functions are never called in atomic context, > namely never in an interrupt handler or holding a spinlock. >

Re: [PATCH] base: power: domain: Replace mdelay with msleep

2018-01-26 Thread Jia-Ju Bai
On 2018/1/26 18:26, Pavel Machek wrote: On Fri 2018-01-26 16:38:19, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: After checking all possible call chains to genpd_dev_pm_detach() and genpd_dev_pm_attach() here, my tool finds that these functions are never called in atomic context, namely never in an interrupt handler or

Re: [PATCH] base: power: domain: Replace mdelay with msleep

2018-01-26 Thread Jia-Ju Bai
On 2018/1/26 18:26, Pavel Machek wrote: On Fri 2018-01-26 16:38:19, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: After checking all possible call chains to genpd_dev_pm_detach() and genpd_dev_pm_attach() here, my tool finds that these functions are never called in atomic context, namely never in an interrupt handler or

Re: [PATCH] base: power: domain: Replace mdelay with msleep

2018-01-26 Thread Pavel Machek
On Fri 2018-01-26 16:38:19, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > After checking all possible call chains to genpd_dev_pm_detach() and > genpd_dev_pm_attach() here, > my tool finds that these functions are never called in atomic context, > namely never in an interrupt handler or holding a spinlock. > Thus mdelay

Re: [PATCH] base: power: domain: Replace mdelay with msleep

2018-01-26 Thread Pavel Machek
On Fri 2018-01-26 16:38:19, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > After checking all possible call chains to genpd_dev_pm_detach() and > genpd_dev_pm_attach() here, > my tool finds that these functions are never called in atomic context, > namely never in an interrupt handler or holding a spinlock. > Thus mdelay