Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: Fix Coding style reported by checkpatch.pl
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:38 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, July 14, 2014 12:40:24 PM pramod gurav wrote:
>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>> Can we consider these changes if there are no issues with this?
>
> Well, are you "fixing" checkpatch.pl warnings just for the sake of
> this or is there a deeper reason?
>
I was browsing through the source code and found couple of them. Then
ran checkpatch.pl to see if there are more. And thought the error
"Fixed: ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition" must be fixed.
Otherwise there is no reason.
> Rafael
>
>
>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:28 PM, pramod gurav
>> wrote:
>> > +linux-pm
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Pramod Gurav
>> > wrote:
>> >> Fixed: ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition
>> >> Fixed: WARNING: EXPORT_SYMBOL should immediately follow its function
>> >> Fixed: WARNING: line over 80 characters in a comment
>> >>
>> >> CC: Rafael J. Wysocki
>> >> CC: Daniel Lezcano
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav
>> >> ---
>> >> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 18 --
>> >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
>> >> index 8236746..2c8752e 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
>> >> @@ -179,7 +179,9 @@ void cpuidle_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int
>> >> index)
>> >> void cpuidle_install_idle_handler(void)
>> >> {
>> >> if (enabled_devices) {
>> >> - /* Make sure all changes finished before we switch to new
>> >> idle */
>> >> + /*
>> >> +* Make sure all changes finished before we switch to new
>> >> idle
>> >> +*/
>> >> smp_wmb();
>> >> initialized = 1;
>> >> }
>> >> @@ -204,7 +206,6 @@ void cpuidle_pause_and_lock(void)
>> >> mutex_lock(_lock);
>> >> cpuidle_uninstall_idle_handler();
>> >> }
>> >> -
>> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_pause_and_lock);
>> >>
>> >> /**
>> >> @@ -215,7 +216,6 @@ void cpuidle_resume_and_unlock(void)
>> >> cpuidle_install_idle_handler();
>> >> mutex_unlock(_lock);
>> >> }
>> >> -
>> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_resume_and_unlock);
>> >>
>> >> /* Currently used in suspend/resume path to suspend cpuidle */
>> >> @@ -267,9 +267,11 @@ int cpuidle_enable_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
>> >> if (ret)
>> >> return ret;
>> >>
>> >> - if (cpuidle_curr_governor->enable &&
>> >> - (ret = cpuidle_curr_governor->enable(drv, dev)))
>> >> - goto fail_sysfs;
>> >> + if (cpuidle_curr_governor->enable) {
>> >> + ret = cpuidle_curr_governor->enable(drv, dev);
>> >> + if (ret)
>> >> + goto fail_sysfs;
>> >> + }
>> >>
>> >> smp_wmb();
>> >>
>> >> @@ -283,7 +285,6 @@ fail_sysfs:
>> >>
>> >> return ret;
>> >> }
>> >> -
>> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_enable_device);
>> >>
>> >> /**
>> >> @@ -311,7 +312,6 @@ void cpuidle_disable_device(struct cpuidle_device
>> >> *dev)
>> >> cpuidle_remove_device_sysfs(dev);
>> >> enabled_devices--;
>> >> }
>> >> -
>> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_disable_device);
>> >>
>> >> static void __cpuidle_unregister_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
>> >> @@ -399,7 +399,6 @@ out_unregister:
>> >> __cpuidle_unregister_device(dev);
>> >> goto out_unlock;
>> >> }
>> >> -
>> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_register_device);
>> >>
>> >> /**
>> >> @@ -423,7 +422,6 @@ void cpuidle_unregister_device(struct cpuidle_device
>> >> *dev)
>> >>
>> >> cpuidle_resume_and_unlock();
>> >> }
>> >> -
>> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_unregister_device);
>> >>
>> >> /**
>> >> --
>> >> 1.7.9.5
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Thanks and Regards
>> > Pramod
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> I speak only for myself.
> Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
Thanks and Regards
Pramod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: Fix Coding style reported by checkpatch.pl
On Monday, July 14, 2014 12:40:24 PM pramod gurav wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> Can we consider these changes if there are no issues with this?
Well, are you "fixing" checkpatch.pl warnings just for the sake of
this or is there a deeper reason?
Rafael
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:28 PM, pramod gurav
> wrote:
> > +linux-pm
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Pramod Gurav
> > wrote:
> >> Fixed: ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition
> >> Fixed: WARNING: EXPORT_SYMBOL should immediately follow its function
> >> Fixed: WARNING: line over 80 characters in a comment
> >>
> >> CC: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >> CC: Daniel Lezcano
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav
> >> ---
> >> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 18 --
> >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> >> index 8236746..2c8752e 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> >> @@ -179,7 +179,9 @@ void cpuidle_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int
> >> index)
> >> void cpuidle_install_idle_handler(void)
> >> {
> >> if (enabled_devices) {
> >> - /* Make sure all changes finished before we switch to new
> >> idle */
> >> + /*
> >> +* Make sure all changes finished before we switch to new
> >> idle
> >> +*/
> >> smp_wmb();
> >> initialized = 1;
> >> }
> >> @@ -204,7 +206,6 @@ void cpuidle_pause_and_lock(void)
> >> mutex_lock(_lock);
> >> cpuidle_uninstall_idle_handler();
> >> }
> >> -
> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_pause_and_lock);
> >>
> >> /**
> >> @@ -215,7 +216,6 @@ void cpuidle_resume_and_unlock(void)
> >> cpuidle_install_idle_handler();
> >> mutex_unlock(_lock);
> >> }
> >> -
> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_resume_and_unlock);
> >>
> >> /* Currently used in suspend/resume path to suspend cpuidle */
> >> @@ -267,9 +267,11 @@ int cpuidle_enable_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
> >> if (ret)
> >> return ret;
> >>
> >> - if (cpuidle_curr_governor->enable &&
> >> - (ret = cpuidle_curr_governor->enable(drv, dev)))
> >> - goto fail_sysfs;
> >> + if (cpuidle_curr_governor->enable) {
> >> + ret = cpuidle_curr_governor->enable(drv, dev);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + goto fail_sysfs;
> >> + }
> >>
> >> smp_wmb();
> >>
> >> @@ -283,7 +285,6 @@ fail_sysfs:
> >>
> >> return ret;
> >> }
> >> -
> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_enable_device);
> >>
> >> /**
> >> @@ -311,7 +312,6 @@ void cpuidle_disable_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
> >> cpuidle_remove_device_sysfs(dev);
> >> enabled_devices--;
> >> }
> >> -
> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_disable_device);
> >>
> >> static void __cpuidle_unregister_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
> >> @@ -399,7 +399,6 @@ out_unregister:
> >> __cpuidle_unregister_device(dev);
> >> goto out_unlock;
> >> }
> >> -
> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_register_device);
> >>
> >> /**
> >> @@ -423,7 +422,6 @@ void cpuidle_unregister_device(struct cpuidle_device
> >> *dev)
> >>
> >> cpuidle_resume_and_unlock();
> >> }
> >> -
> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_unregister_device);
> >>
> >> /**
> >> --
> >> 1.7.9.5
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks and Regards
> > Pramod
>
>
>
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: Fix Coding style reported by checkpatch.pl
Hi Rafael,
Can we consider these changes if there are no issues with this?
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:28 PM, pramod gurav
wrote:
> +linux-pm
>
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Pramod Gurav
> wrote:
>> Fixed: ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition
>> Fixed: WARNING: EXPORT_SYMBOL should immediately follow its function
>> Fixed: WARNING: line over 80 characters in a comment
>>
>> CC: Rafael J. Wysocki
>> CC: Daniel Lezcano
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav
>> ---
>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 18 --
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
>> index 8236746..2c8752e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
>> @@ -179,7 +179,9 @@ void cpuidle_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int
>> index)
>> void cpuidle_install_idle_handler(void)
>> {
>> if (enabled_devices) {
>> - /* Make sure all changes finished before we switch to new
>> idle */
>> + /*
>> +* Make sure all changes finished before we switch to new
>> idle
>> +*/
>> smp_wmb();
>> initialized = 1;
>> }
>> @@ -204,7 +206,6 @@ void cpuidle_pause_and_lock(void)
>> mutex_lock(_lock);
>> cpuidle_uninstall_idle_handler();
>> }
>> -
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_pause_and_lock);
>>
>> /**
>> @@ -215,7 +216,6 @@ void cpuidle_resume_and_unlock(void)
>> cpuidle_install_idle_handler();
>> mutex_unlock(_lock);
>> }
>> -
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_resume_and_unlock);
>>
>> /* Currently used in suspend/resume path to suspend cpuidle */
>> @@ -267,9 +267,11 @@ int cpuidle_enable_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> - if (cpuidle_curr_governor->enable &&
>> - (ret = cpuidle_curr_governor->enable(drv, dev)))
>> - goto fail_sysfs;
>> + if (cpuidle_curr_governor->enable) {
>> + ret = cpuidle_curr_governor->enable(drv, dev);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto fail_sysfs;
>> + }
>>
>> smp_wmb();
>>
>> @@ -283,7 +285,6 @@ fail_sysfs:
>>
>> return ret;
>> }
>> -
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_enable_device);
>>
>> /**
>> @@ -311,7 +312,6 @@ void cpuidle_disable_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
>> cpuidle_remove_device_sysfs(dev);
>> enabled_devices--;
>> }
>> -
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_disable_device);
>>
>> static void __cpuidle_unregister_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
>> @@ -399,7 +399,6 @@ out_unregister:
>> __cpuidle_unregister_device(dev);
>> goto out_unlock;
>> }
>> -
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_register_device);
>>
>> /**
>> @@ -423,7 +422,6 @@ void cpuidle_unregister_device(struct cpuidle_device
>> *dev)
>>
>> cpuidle_resume_and_unlock();
>> }
>> -
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_unregister_device);
>>
>> /**
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks and Regards
> Pramod
--
Thanks and Regards
Pramod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: Fix Coding style reported by checkpatch.pl
Hi Rafael,
Can we consider these changes if there are no issues with this?
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:28 PM, pramod gurav
pramod.gurav@gmail.com wrote:
+linux-pm
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Pramod Gurav
pramod.gurav@gmail.com wrote:
Fixed: ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition
Fixed: WARNING: EXPORT_SYMBOL should immediately follow its function
Fixed: WARNING: line over 80 characters in a comment
CC: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net
CC: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav pramod.gurav@gmail.com
---
drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 18 --
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
index 8236746..2c8752e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
@@ -179,7 +179,9 @@ void cpuidle_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int
index)
void cpuidle_install_idle_handler(void)
{
if (enabled_devices) {
- /* Make sure all changes finished before we switch to new
idle */
+ /*
+* Make sure all changes finished before we switch to new
idle
+*/
smp_wmb();
initialized = 1;
}
@@ -204,7 +206,6 @@ void cpuidle_pause_and_lock(void)
mutex_lock(cpuidle_lock);
cpuidle_uninstall_idle_handler();
}
-
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_pause_and_lock);
/**
@@ -215,7 +216,6 @@ void cpuidle_resume_and_unlock(void)
cpuidle_install_idle_handler();
mutex_unlock(cpuidle_lock);
}
-
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_resume_and_unlock);
/* Currently used in suspend/resume path to suspend cpuidle */
@@ -267,9 +267,11 @@ int cpuidle_enable_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
if (ret)
return ret;
- if (cpuidle_curr_governor-enable
- (ret = cpuidle_curr_governor-enable(drv, dev)))
- goto fail_sysfs;
+ if (cpuidle_curr_governor-enable) {
+ ret = cpuidle_curr_governor-enable(drv, dev);
+ if (ret)
+ goto fail_sysfs;
+ }
smp_wmb();
@@ -283,7 +285,6 @@ fail_sysfs:
return ret;
}
-
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_enable_device);
/**
@@ -311,7 +312,6 @@ void cpuidle_disable_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
cpuidle_remove_device_sysfs(dev);
enabled_devices--;
}
-
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_disable_device);
static void __cpuidle_unregister_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
@@ -399,7 +399,6 @@ out_unregister:
__cpuidle_unregister_device(dev);
goto out_unlock;
}
-
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_register_device);
/**
@@ -423,7 +422,6 @@ void cpuidle_unregister_device(struct cpuidle_device
*dev)
cpuidle_resume_and_unlock();
}
-
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_unregister_device);
/**
--
1.7.9.5
--
Thanks and Regards
Pramod
--
Thanks and Regards
Pramod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: Fix Coding style reported by checkpatch.pl
On Monday, July 14, 2014 12:40:24 PM pramod gurav wrote:
Hi Rafael,
Can we consider these changes if there are no issues with this?
Well, are you fixing checkpatch.pl warnings just for the sake of
this or is there a deeper reason?
Rafael
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:28 PM, pramod gurav
pramod.gurav@gmail.com wrote:
+linux-pm
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Pramod Gurav
pramod.gurav@gmail.com wrote:
Fixed: ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition
Fixed: WARNING: EXPORT_SYMBOL should immediately follow its function
Fixed: WARNING: line over 80 characters in a comment
CC: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net
CC: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav pramod.gurav@gmail.com
---
drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 18 --
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
index 8236746..2c8752e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
@@ -179,7 +179,9 @@ void cpuidle_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int
index)
void cpuidle_install_idle_handler(void)
{
if (enabled_devices) {
- /* Make sure all changes finished before we switch to new
idle */
+ /*
+* Make sure all changes finished before we switch to new
idle
+*/
smp_wmb();
initialized = 1;
}
@@ -204,7 +206,6 @@ void cpuidle_pause_and_lock(void)
mutex_lock(cpuidle_lock);
cpuidle_uninstall_idle_handler();
}
-
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_pause_and_lock);
/**
@@ -215,7 +216,6 @@ void cpuidle_resume_and_unlock(void)
cpuidle_install_idle_handler();
mutex_unlock(cpuidle_lock);
}
-
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_resume_and_unlock);
/* Currently used in suspend/resume path to suspend cpuidle */
@@ -267,9 +267,11 @@ int cpuidle_enable_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
if (ret)
return ret;
- if (cpuidle_curr_governor-enable
- (ret = cpuidle_curr_governor-enable(drv, dev)))
- goto fail_sysfs;
+ if (cpuidle_curr_governor-enable) {
+ ret = cpuidle_curr_governor-enable(drv, dev);
+ if (ret)
+ goto fail_sysfs;
+ }
smp_wmb();
@@ -283,7 +285,6 @@ fail_sysfs:
return ret;
}
-
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_enable_device);
/**
@@ -311,7 +312,6 @@ void cpuidle_disable_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
cpuidle_remove_device_sysfs(dev);
enabled_devices--;
}
-
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_disable_device);
static void __cpuidle_unregister_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
@@ -399,7 +399,6 @@ out_unregister:
__cpuidle_unregister_device(dev);
goto out_unlock;
}
-
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_register_device);
/**
@@ -423,7 +422,6 @@ void cpuidle_unregister_device(struct cpuidle_device
*dev)
cpuidle_resume_and_unlock();
}
-
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_unregister_device);
/**
--
1.7.9.5
--
Thanks and Regards
Pramod
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: Fix Coding style reported by checkpatch.pl
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:38 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net wrote:
On Monday, July 14, 2014 12:40:24 PM pramod gurav wrote:
Hi Rafael,
Can we consider these changes if there are no issues with this?
Well, are you fixing checkpatch.pl warnings just for the sake of
this or is there a deeper reason?
I was browsing through the source code and found couple of them. Then
ran checkpatch.pl to see if there are more. And thought the error
Fixed: ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition must be fixed.
Otherwise there is no reason.
Rafael
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:28 PM, pramod gurav
pramod.gurav@gmail.com wrote:
+linux-pm
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Pramod Gurav
pramod.gurav@gmail.com wrote:
Fixed: ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition
Fixed: WARNING: EXPORT_SYMBOL should immediately follow its function
Fixed: WARNING: line over 80 characters in a comment
CC: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net
CC: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav pramod.gurav@gmail.com
---
drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 18 --
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
index 8236746..2c8752e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
@@ -179,7 +179,9 @@ void cpuidle_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int
index)
void cpuidle_install_idle_handler(void)
{
if (enabled_devices) {
- /* Make sure all changes finished before we switch to new
idle */
+ /*
+* Make sure all changes finished before we switch to new
idle
+*/
smp_wmb();
initialized = 1;
}
@@ -204,7 +206,6 @@ void cpuidle_pause_and_lock(void)
mutex_lock(cpuidle_lock);
cpuidle_uninstall_idle_handler();
}
-
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_pause_and_lock);
/**
@@ -215,7 +216,6 @@ void cpuidle_resume_and_unlock(void)
cpuidle_install_idle_handler();
mutex_unlock(cpuidle_lock);
}
-
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_resume_and_unlock);
/* Currently used in suspend/resume path to suspend cpuidle */
@@ -267,9 +267,11 @@ int cpuidle_enable_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
if (ret)
return ret;
- if (cpuidle_curr_governor-enable
- (ret = cpuidle_curr_governor-enable(drv, dev)))
- goto fail_sysfs;
+ if (cpuidle_curr_governor-enable) {
+ ret = cpuidle_curr_governor-enable(drv, dev);
+ if (ret)
+ goto fail_sysfs;
+ }
smp_wmb();
@@ -283,7 +285,6 @@ fail_sysfs:
return ret;
}
-
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_enable_device);
/**
@@ -311,7 +312,6 @@ void cpuidle_disable_device(struct cpuidle_device
*dev)
cpuidle_remove_device_sysfs(dev);
enabled_devices--;
}
-
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_disable_device);
static void __cpuidle_unregister_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
@@ -399,7 +399,6 @@ out_unregister:
__cpuidle_unregister_device(dev);
goto out_unlock;
}
-
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_register_device);
/**
@@ -423,7 +422,6 @@ void cpuidle_unregister_device(struct cpuidle_device
*dev)
cpuidle_resume_and_unlock();
}
-
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_unregister_device);
/**
--
1.7.9.5
--
Thanks and Regards
Pramod
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
Thanks and Regards
Pramod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: Fix Coding style reported by checkpatch.pl
+linux-pm
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Pramod Gurav
wrote:
> Fixed: ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition
> Fixed: WARNING: EXPORT_SYMBOL should immediately follow its function
> Fixed: WARNING: line over 80 characters in a comment
>
> CC: Rafael J. Wysocki
> CC: Daniel Lezcano
>
> Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav
> ---
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 18 --
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> index 8236746..2c8752e 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> @@ -179,7 +179,9 @@ void cpuidle_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int
> index)
> void cpuidle_install_idle_handler(void)
> {
> if (enabled_devices) {
> - /* Make sure all changes finished before we switch to new
> idle */
> + /*
> +* Make sure all changes finished before we switch to new idle
> +*/
> smp_wmb();
> initialized = 1;
> }
> @@ -204,7 +206,6 @@ void cpuidle_pause_and_lock(void)
> mutex_lock(_lock);
> cpuidle_uninstall_idle_handler();
> }
> -
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_pause_and_lock);
>
> /**
> @@ -215,7 +216,6 @@ void cpuidle_resume_and_unlock(void)
> cpuidle_install_idle_handler();
> mutex_unlock(_lock);
> }
> -
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_resume_and_unlock);
>
> /* Currently used in suspend/resume path to suspend cpuidle */
> @@ -267,9 +267,11 @@ int cpuidle_enable_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - if (cpuidle_curr_governor->enable &&
> - (ret = cpuidle_curr_governor->enable(drv, dev)))
> - goto fail_sysfs;
> + if (cpuidle_curr_governor->enable) {
> + ret = cpuidle_curr_governor->enable(drv, dev);
> + if (ret)
> + goto fail_sysfs;
> + }
>
> smp_wmb();
>
> @@ -283,7 +285,6 @@ fail_sysfs:
>
> return ret;
> }
> -
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_enable_device);
>
> /**
> @@ -311,7 +312,6 @@ void cpuidle_disable_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
> cpuidle_remove_device_sysfs(dev);
> enabled_devices--;
> }
> -
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_disable_device);
>
> static void __cpuidle_unregister_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
> @@ -399,7 +399,6 @@ out_unregister:
> __cpuidle_unregister_device(dev);
> goto out_unlock;
> }
> -
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_register_device);
>
> /**
> @@ -423,7 +422,6 @@ void cpuidle_unregister_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
>
> cpuidle_resume_and_unlock();
> }
> -
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_unregister_device);
>
> /**
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
--
Thanks and Regards
Pramod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: Fix Coding style reported by checkpatch.pl
+linux-pm
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Pramod Gurav
pramod.gurav@gmail.com wrote:
Fixed: ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition
Fixed: WARNING: EXPORT_SYMBOL should immediately follow its function
Fixed: WARNING: line over 80 characters in a comment
CC: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net
CC: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav pramod.gurav@gmail.com
---
drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 18 --
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
index 8236746..2c8752e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
@@ -179,7 +179,9 @@ void cpuidle_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int
index)
void cpuidle_install_idle_handler(void)
{
if (enabled_devices) {
- /* Make sure all changes finished before we switch to new
idle */
+ /*
+* Make sure all changes finished before we switch to new idle
+*/
smp_wmb();
initialized = 1;
}
@@ -204,7 +206,6 @@ void cpuidle_pause_and_lock(void)
mutex_lock(cpuidle_lock);
cpuidle_uninstall_idle_handler();
}
-
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_pause_and_lock);
/**
@@ -215,7 +216,6 @@ void cpuidle_resume_and_unlock(void)
cpuidle_install_idle_handler();
mutex_unlock(cpuidle_lock);
}
-
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_resume_and_unlock);
/* Currently used in suspend/resume path to suspend cpuidle */
@@ -267,9 +267,11 @@ int cpuidle_enable_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
if (ret)
return ret;
- if (cpuidle_curr_governor-enable
- (ret = cpuidle_curr_governor-enable(drv, dev)))
- goto fail_sysfs;
+ if (cpuidle_curr_governor-enable) {
+ ret = cpuidle_curr_governor-enable(drv, dev);
+ if (ret)
+ goto fail_sysfs;
+ }
smp_wmb();
@@ -283,7 +285,6 @@ fail_sysfs:
return ret;
}
-
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_enable_device);
/**
@@ -311,7 +312,6 @@ void cpuidle_disable_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
cpuidle_remove_device_sysfs(dev);
enabled_devices--;
}
-
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_disable_device);
static void __cpuidle_unregister_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
@@ -399,7 +399,6 @@ out_unregister:
__cpuidle_unregister_device(dev);
goto out_unlock;
}
-
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_register_device);
/**
@@ -423,7 +422,6 @@ void cpuidle_unregister_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
cpuidle_resume_and_unlock();
}
-
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_unregister_device);
/**
--
1.7.9.5
--
Thanks and Regards
Pramod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
