On 01/24/2014 01:24 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:21:26AM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>> If given buffer size is zero, we forget to rcu_read_unlock()
>> on error path.
>
> Er... Where could we ever get called with size zero? IOW, the
> real question is whether that check
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:21:26AM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> If given buffer size is zero, we forget to rcu_read_unlock()
> on error path.
Er... Where could we ever get called with size zero? IOW, the
real question is whether that check makes any sense. If nothing
else, a much more
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:21:26AM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
If given buffer size is zero, we forget to rcu_read_unlock()
on error path.
Er... Where could we ever get called with size zero? IOW, the
real question is whether that check makes any sense. If nothing
else, a much more obvious
On 01/24/2014 01:24 PM, Al Viro wrote:
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:21:26AM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
If given buffer size is zero, we forget to rcu_read_unlock()
on error path.
Er... Where could we ever get called with size zero? IOW, the
real question is whether that check makes any
4 matches
Mail list logo
