On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 22:49:53 +0200 Laurent Navet <laurent.na...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No need to be be, just be should be sufficient. To be be, or not to be be? :) Applied to the docs tree, thanks. jon
On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 22:49:53 +0200 Laurent Navet <laurent.na...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No need to be be, just be should be sufficient. To be be, or not to be be? :) Applied to the docs tree, thanks. jon