On Saturday 27 July 2013 02:15 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Friday 26 of July 2013 09:40:15 Stephen Warren wrote:
(CC'ing the new DT binding maintainers and mailing list on this reply,
hence quoting the whole of the DT binding)
On 07/25/2013 06:29 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
Palmas series device
On Friday 26 July 2013 10:12 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 07/26/2013 10:35 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 09:40:15AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
Given there's only 1 battery, I think "back-" is redundant in
the property names. Since that shortens the names a bit, I'd
suggest
On Friday 26 July 2013 10:12 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 07/26/2013 10:35 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 09:40:15AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
Given there's only 1 battery, I think back- is redundant in
the property names. Since that shortens the names a bit, I'd
suggest
On Saturday 27 July 2013 02:15 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Friday 26 of July 2013 09:40:15 Stephen Warren wrote:
(CC'ing the new DT binding maintainers and mailing list on this reply,
hence quoting the whole of the DT binding)
On 07/25/2013 06:29 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
Palmas series device
On Friday 26 of July 2013 09:40:15 Stephen Warren wrote:
> (CC'ing the new DT binding maintainers and mailing list on this reply,
> hence quoting the whole of the DT binding)
>
> On 07/25/2013 06:29 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> > Palmas series device like TPS65913, TPS80036 supports the backup
>
On 07/26/2013 10:35 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 09:40:15AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>
>> Given there's only 1 battery, I think "back-" is redundant in
>> the property names. Since that shortens the names a bit, I'd
>> suggest spelling everything out in full, perhaps:
>
>
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 09:40:15AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Given there's only 1 battery, I think "back-" is redundant in the
> property names. Since that shortens the names a bit, I'd suggest
> spelling everything out in full, perhaps:
Isn't there an integrated charger on the PMIC? If
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 04:40:15PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
> (CC'ing the new DT binding maintainers and mailing list on this reply,
> hence quoting the whole of the DT binding)
Thanks Stephen.
>
> On 07/25/2013 06:29 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> > Palmas series device like TPS65913,
(CC'ing the new DT binding maintainers and mailing list on this reply,
hence quoting the whole of the DT binding)
On 07/25/2013 06:29 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> Palmas series device like TPS65913, TPS80036 supports the backup battery
> for powering the RTC when no other energy source is
(CC'ing the new DT binding maintainers and mailing list on this reply,
hence quoting the whole of the DT binding)
On 07/25/2013 06:29 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
Palmas series device like TPS65913, TPS80036 supports the backup battery
for powering the RTC when no other energy source is
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 04:40:15PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
(CC'ing the new DT binding maintainers and mailing list on this reply,
hence quoting the whole of the DT binding)
Thanks Stephen.
On 07/25/2013 06:29 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
Palmas series device like TPS65913, TPS80036
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 09:40:15AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
Given there's only 1 battery, I think back- is redundant in the
property names. Since that shortens the names a bit, I'd suggest
spelling everything out in full, perhaps:
Isn't there an integrated charger on the PMIC? If there
On 07/26/2013 10:35 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 09:40:15AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
Given there's only 1 battery, I think back- is redundant in
the property names. Since that shortens the names a bit, I'd
suggest spelling everything out in full, perhaps:
Isn't there
On Friday 26 of July 2013 09:40:15 Stephen Warren wrote:
(CC'ing the new DT binding maintainers and mailing list on this reply,
hence quoting the whole of the DT binding)
On 07/25/2013 06:29 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
Palmas series device like TPS65913, TPS80036 supports the backup
14 matches
Mail list logo
