Re: [PATCH] fs/proc/array.c: slightly improve render_sigset_t

2016-11-09 Thread Andrei Vagin
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > format_decode and vsnprintf occasionally show up in perf top, so I > went looking for places that might not need the full printf > power. With the help of kprobes, I gathered some statistics on which > format strings we mostly pass to vsnp

Re: [PATCH] fs/proc/array.c: slightly improve render_sigset_t

2016-10-06 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 06 Oct 2016 00:48:59 +0200 Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21 2016, Kees Cook wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Rasmus Villemoes > > wrote: > > > > Heheh. Nice. :) > > > > Acked-by: Kees Cook > > > > Andrew, ping? Yup, I have this queued for processing after -rc1.

Re: [PATCH] fs/proc/array.c: slightly improve render_sigset_t

2016-10-05 Thread Rasmus Villemoes
On Wed, Sep 21 2016, Kees Cook wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Rasmus Villemoes > wrote: > > Heheh. Nice. :) > > Acked-by: Kees Cook > Andrew, ping?

Re: [PATCH] fs/proc/array.c: slightly improve render_sigset_t

2016-09-21 Thread Rasmus Villemoes
On Wed, Sep 21 2016, Kees Cook wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Rasmus Villemoes > wrote: >> format_decode and vsnprintf occasionally show up in perf top, so I >> went looking for places that might not need the full printf >> power. With the help of kprobes, I gathered some statistics o

Re: [PATCH] fs/proc/array.c: slightly improve render_sigset_t

2016-09-20 Thread Kees Cook
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > format_decode and vsnprintf occasionally show up in perf top, so I > went looking for places that might not need the full printf > power. With the help of kprobes, I gathered some statistics on which > format strings we mostly pass to vsnp