On Thursday, March 05, 2015 11:04:11 AM Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:17:29PM +, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > tiny tiny nitpick:
> >
> > On 04/03/2015 at 20:00:40 +, Mark Rutland wrote :
> > > With certain restrictions it is possible for a wakeup device to share
> > >
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 11:33:06AM +, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 05/03/2015 at 11:04:11 +, Mark Rutland wrote :
> > > > +In rare cases an IRQ can be shared between a wakeup device driver and
> > > > an
> > > > +IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user. In order for this to be safe, the wakeup device
> >
On 05/03/2015 at 11:04:11 +, Mark Rutland wrote :
> > > +In rare cases an IRQ can be shared between a wakeup device driver and an
> > > +IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user. In order for this to be safe, the wakeup device
> > > driver
> > > +must be able to discern spurious IRQs from genuine wakeup events
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:17:29PM +, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> tiny tiny nitpick:
>
> On 04/03/2015 at 20:00:40 +, Mark Rutland wrote :
> > With certain restrictions it is possible for a wakeup device to share
> > and IRQ with an IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user, and the warnings introduced by
>
On Thursday, March 05, 2015 11:04:11 AM Mark Rutland wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:17:29PM +, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
tiny tiny nitpick:
On 04/03/2015 at 20:00:40 +, Mark Rutland wrote :
With certain restrictions it is possible for a wakeup device to share
and IRQ with
On 05/03/2015 at 11:04:11 +, Mark Rutland wrote :
+In rare cases an IRQ can be shared between a wakeup device driver and an
+IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user. In order for this to be safe, the wakeup device
driver
+must be able to discern spurious IRQs from genuine wakeup events
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:17:29PM +, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
tiny tiny nitpick:
On 04/03/2015 at 20:00:40 +, Mark Rutland wrote :
With certain restrictions it is possible for a wakeup device to share
and IRQ with an IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user, and the warnings introduced by
^ an
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 11:33:06AM +, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
On 05/03/2015 at 11:04:11 +, Mark Rutland wrote :
+In rare cases an IRQ can be shared between a wakeup device driver and
an
+IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user. In order for this to be safe, the wakeup device
driver
On Wednesday 04 March 2015 23:17:29 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 04/03/2015 at 20:00:40 +, Mark Rutland wrote :
> > With certain restrictions it is possible for a wakeup device to share
> > and IRQ with an IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user, and the warnings introduced by
> ^ an
>
>
> > +In rare cases
tiny tiny nitpick:
On 04/03/2015 at 20:00:40 +, Mark Rutland wrote :
> With certain restrictions it is possible for a wakeup device to share
> and IRQ with an IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user, and the warnings introduced by
^ an
> +In rare cases an IRQ can be shared between a wakeup device driver and
On Wednesday, March 04, 2015 08:00:40 PM Mark Rutland wrote:
> With certain restrictions it is possible for a wakeup device to share
> and IRQ with an IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user, and the warnings introduced by
> commit cab303be91dc47942bc25de33dc1140123540800 are spurious. The new
> IRQF_COND_SUSPEND
On Wednesday, March 04, 2015 08:00:40 PM Mark Rutland wrote:
With certain restrictions it is possible for a wakeup device to share
and IRQ with an IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user, and the warnings introduced by
commit cab303be91dc47942bc25de33dc1140123540800 are spurious. The new
IRQF_COND_SUSPEND flag
tiny tiny nitpick:
On 04/03/2015 at 20:00:40 +, Mark Rutland wrote :
With certain restrictions it is possible for a wakeup device to share
and IRQ with an IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user, and the warnings introduced by
^ an
+In rare cases an IRQ can be shared between a wakeup device driver and an
On Wednesday 04 March 2015 23:17:29 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
On 04/03/2015 at 20:00:40 +, Mark Rutland wrote :
With certain restrictions it is possible for a wakeup device to share
and IRQ with an IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user, and the warnings introduced by
^ an
+In rare cases an IRQ can
14 matches
Mail list logo