Hi Robin,
On Friday 13 Jan 2017 12:17:24 Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 13/01/17 11:59, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> >> On 13/01/17 11:07, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >>> Add support for DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS to the generic IOMMU DMA code.
> >
Hi Robin,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 13/01/17 11:59, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>> On 13/01/17 11:07, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Add support for DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS to the generic IOMMU DMA code.
>>
On 13/01/17 11:59, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Robin,
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> On 13/01/17 11:07, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> Add support for DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS to the generic IOMMU DMA code.
>>> This allows to allocate physically contiguous DMA buf
Hi Robin,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 13/01/17 11:07, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Add support for DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS to the generic IOMMU DMA code.
>> This allows to allocate physically contiguous DMA buffers on arm64
>> systems with an IOMMU.
>
> Can anyone
On 13/01/17 11:07, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Add support for DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS to the generic IOMMU DMA code.
> This allows to allocate physically contiguous DMA buffers on arm64
> systems with an IOMMU.
Can anyone explain what this attribute is actually used for? I've never
quite figure
5 matches
Mail list logo