On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 1:05 AM Nick Desaulniers
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 3:59 PM Miguel Ojeda
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 10:45 PM Nathan Chancellor
> > wrote:
> > > * Revert commit bfd77145f35c ("Makefile: Convert -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
> > > to just -Wimplicit-fallthr
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 3:59 PM Miguel Ojeda
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 10:45 PM Nathan Chancellor
> wrote:
> > * Revert commit bfd77145f35c ("Makefile: Convert -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
> > to just -Wimplicit-fallthrough for clang") for the time being and just
> > rely on adding -Wimplici
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 10:45 PM Nathan Chancellor
wrote:
>
> I am still not a huge fan of the CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG ifdefs but I don't
> really see a much cleaner way to get around this. Some that come to
> mind:
Yeah...
> * Revert commit bfd77145f35c ("Makefile: Convert -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 1:45 PM Nathan Chancellor
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 11:20:29AM -0700, 'Nathan Huckleberry' via Clang
> Built Linux wrote:
> > Clang is updating to support -Wimplicit-fallthrough on C
> > https://reviews.llvm.org/D64838. Since clang does not
> > support the comment
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 11:20:29AM -0700, 'Nathan Huckleberry' via Clang Built
Linux wrote:
> Clang is updating to support -Wimplicit-fallthrough on C
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D64838. Since clang does not
> support the comment version of fallthrough annotations
> this update causes an additional
5 matches
Mail list logo