Re: [PATCH] leds: Convert to using %pOF instead of full_name

2017-08-12 Thread Jacek Anaszewski
On 08/08/2017 10:09 AM, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Tue 2017-07-18 16:43:11, Rob Herring wrote: >> Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of >> full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing >> of the full path string for each node. >> >> Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH] leds: Convert to using %pOF instead of full_name

2017-08-12 Thread Jacek Anaszewski
On 08/08/2017 10:09 AM, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Tue 2017-07-18 16:43:11, Rob Herring wrote: >> Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of >> full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing >> of the full path string for each node. >> >> Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH] leds: Convert to using %pOF instead of full_name

2017-08-08 Thread Pavel Machek
On Tue 2017-07-18 16:43:11, Rob Herring wrote: > Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of > full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing > of the full path string for each node. > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring > Cc: Richard

Re: [PATCH] leds: Convert to using %pOF instead of full_name

2017-08-08 Thread Pavel Machek
On Tue 2017-07-18 16:43:11, Rob Herring wrote: > Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of > full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing > of the full path string for each node. > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring > Cc: Richard Purdie > Cc: Jacek