Re: [PATCH] leds: add missing header

2007-09-24 Thread Pierre Ossman
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:09:12 +0100 Richard Purdie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 08:14 +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote: > > rwlocks are used in the structures so make sure the right header > > is included. > > > > Signed-off-by: Pierre Ossman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I think

Re: [PATCH] leds: add missing header

2007-09-24 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 08:14 +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote: > rwlocks are used in the structures so make sure the right header > is included. > > Signed-off-by: Pierre Ossman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I think something similar was already committed in revision df96efd73b81b8bc2d23b3d8b6025cce3d43db6c.

Re: [PATCH] leds: add missing header

2007-09-24 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 08:14 +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote: rwlocks are used in the structures so make sure the right header is included. Signed-off-by: Pierre Ossman [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think something similar was already committed in revision df96efd73b81b8bc2d23b3d8b6025cce3d43db6c. Cheers,

Re: [PATCH] leds: add missing header

2007-09-24 Thread Pierre Ossman
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:09:12 +0100 Richard Purdie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 08:14 +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote: rwlocks are used in the structures so make sure the right header is included. Signed-off-by: Pierre Ossman [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think something similar