Re: [PATCH] mfd: tps65218: Reorder tps65218_regulator_id enum

2018-03-07 Thread Lee Jones
On Thu, 15 Feb 2018, Dave Gerlach wrote:

> Commit 2dc4940360d4 ("regulator: tps65218: Remove all the compatibles")
> changes the probe function of drivers/regulator/tps65218-regulator.c so
> that it iterates through all available regulators and assumes that the
> regulator IDs are sequential and match the order present in the enum
> tps65218_regulator_id. However, for some reason the much older commit
> c0ea88b890d6 ("regulator: tps65218: add support for LS3 current
> regulator") updated all arrays with LS3 at the end but added it second
> to last for the enum.
> 
> Because of this long standing mismatch in order between the
> tps65218_regulator_id enum and the regulator_desc array in the tps65218
> regulator driver, the new probe function causes the strobe values to be
> associated with the wrong regulator ID. This causes LDO1 to fail to
> suspend in tps65218_pmic_set_suspend_disable due to not having anything
> probes for its strobe value. Fix the order in the enum so the probe
> function works as the update intended.

This sounds super fragile.

I'm willing to accept this patch if it 'makes stuff work', but we
should look into why a dynamically assigned enum is sensitive to
ordering.  At the very least you should consider providing a comment
with working to that effect.

> Fixes: 2dc4940360d4 ("regulator: tps65218: Remove all the compatibles")
> Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach 
> ---
>  include/linux/mfd/tps65218.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Applied, thanks.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog


Re: [PATCH] mfd: tps65218: Reorder tps65218_regulator_id enum

2018-02-15 Thread Keerthy


On Friday 16 February 2018 09:47 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> Commit 2dc4940360d4 ("regulator: tps65218: Remove all the compatibles")
> changes the probe function of drivers/regulator/tps65218-regulator.c so
> that it iterates through all available regulators and assumes that the
> regulator IDs are sequential and match the order present in the enum
> tps65218_regulator_id. However, for some reason the much older commit
> c0ea88b890d6 ("regulator: tps65218: add support for LS3 current
> regulator") updated all arrays with LS3 at the end but added it second
> to last for the enum.
> 
> Because of this long standing mismatch in order between the
> tps65218_regulator_id enum and the regulator_desc array in the tps65218
> regulator driver, the new probe function causes the strobe values to be
> associated with the wrong regulator ID. This causes LDO1 to fail to
> suspend in tps65218_pmic_set_suspend_disable due to not having anything
> probes for its strobe value. Fix the order in the enum so the probe
> function works as the update intended.

Reviewed-by: Keerthy 

> 
> Fixes: 2dc4940360d4 ("regulator: tps65218: Remove all the compatibles")
> Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach 
> ---
>  include/linux/mfd/tps65218.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/tps65218.h b/include/linux/mfd/tps65218.h
> index f069c518c0ed..c204d9a79436 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mfd/tps65218.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/tps65218.h
> @@ -205,10 +205,10 @@ enum tps65218_regulator_id {
>   TPS65218_DCDC_4,
>   TPS65218_DCDC_5,
>   TPS65218_DCDC_6,
> - /* LS's */
> - TPS65218_LS_3,
>   /* LDOs */
>   TPS65218_LDO_1,
> + /* LS's */
> + TPS65218_LS_3,
>  };
>  
>  #define TPS65218_MAX_REG_ID  TPS65218_LDO_1
>