On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 05:42:28PM -0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
>
>
>On 2018/11/26 16:36, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 08:57:54AM -0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
>> >
>> > On 2018/11/25 17:59, Wei Yang wrote:
>> > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:58 AM zhong jiang
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > On
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 05:42:28PM -0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
>
>
>On 2018/11/26 16:36, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 08:57:54AM -0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
>> >
>> > On 2018/11/25 17:59, Wei Yang wrote:
>> > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:58 AM zhong jiang
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > On
On 2018/11/26 16:36, Wei Yang wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 08:57:54AM -0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
On 2018/11/25 17:59, Wei Yang wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:58 AM zhong jiang wrote:
On 2018/11/17 9:33, Wengang Wang wrote:
The this_cpu_cmpxchg makes the do-while loop pass as long
On 2018/11/26 16:36, Wei Yang wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 08:57:54AM -0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
On 2018/11/25 17:59, Wei Yang wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:58 AM zhong jiang wrote:
On 2018/11/17 9:33, Wengang Wang wrote:
The this_cpu_cmpxchg makes the do-while loop pass as long
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 08:57:54AM -0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
>
>
>On 2018/11/25 17:59, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:58 AM zhong jiang wrote:
>> > On 2018/11/17 9:33, Wengang Wang wrote:
>> > > The this_cpu_cmpxchg makes the do-while loop pass as long as the
>> > >
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 08:57:54AM -0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
>
>
>On 2018/11/25 17:59, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:58 AM zhong jiang wrote:
>> > On 2018/11/17 9:33, Wengang Wang wrote:
>> > > The this_cpu_cmpxchg makes the do-while loop pass as long as the
>> > >
On 2018/11/25 17:59, Wei Yang wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:58 AM zhong jiang wrote:
On 2018/11/17 9:33, Wengang Wang wrote:
The this_cpu_cmpxchg makes the do-while loop pass as long as the
s->cpu_slab->partial as the same value. It doesn't care what happened to
that slab. Interrupt is
On 2018/11/25 17:59, Wei Yang wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:58 AM zhong jiang wrote:
On 2018/11/17 9:33, Wengang Wang wrote:
The this_cpu_cmpxchg makes the do-while loop pass as long as the
s->cpu_slab->partial as the same value. It doesn't care what happened to
that slab. Interrupt is
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:58 AM zhong jiang wrote:
>
> On 2018/11/17 9:33, Wengang Wang wrote:
> > The this_cpu_cmpxchg makes the do-while loop pass as long as the
> > s->cpu_slab->partial as the same value. It doesn't care what happened to
> > that slab. Interrupt is not disabled, and new
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:58 AM zhong jiang wrote:
>
> On 2018/11/17 9:33, Wengang Wang wrote:
> > The this_cpu_cmpxchg makes the do-while loop pass as long as the
> > s->cpu_slab->partial as the same value. It doesn't care what happened to
> > that slab. Interrupt is not disabled, and new
Hi Wengang,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
[also build test WARNING on v4.20-rc3 next-20181121]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Hi Wengang,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
[also build test WARNING on v4.20-rc3 next-20181121]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 07:18:13PM -0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
>Hi Wei,
>
>I think you will receive my reply to Zhong, But I am copying my comments for
>that patch here (again):
>
>Copy starts ==>
>
>I am not sure if the patch you mentioned intended to fix the problem here.
>With that patch the
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 07:18:13PM -0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
>Hi Wei,
>
>I think you will receive my reply to Zhong, But I am copying my comments for
>that patch here (again):
>
>Copy starts ==>
>
>I am not sure if the patch you mentioned intended to fix the problem here.
>With that patch the
Hi Wei,
I think you will receive my reply to Zhong, But I am copying my comments
for that patch here (again):
Copy starts ==>
I am not sure if the patch you mentioned intended to fix the problem here.
With that patch the negative page->pobjects would become a large
positive value,
it will
Hi Wei,
I think you will receive my reply to Zhong, But I am copying my comments
for that patch here (again):
Copy starts ==>
I am not sure if the patch you mentioned intended to fix the problem here.
With that patch the negative page->pobjects would become a large
positive value,
it will
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 09:58:58AM -0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
>Hi Wei,
>
>
>On 2018/11/17 17:02, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 05:33:35PM -0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
>> > The this_cpu_cmpxchg makes the do-while loop pass as long as the
>> > s->cpu_slab->partial as the same value. It
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 09:58:58AM -0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
>Hi Wei,
>
>
>On 2018/11/17 17:02, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 05:33:35PM -0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
>> > The this_cpu_cmpxchg makes the do-while loop pass as long as the
>> > s->cpu_slab->partial as the same value. It
Hi Zhong,
On 2018/11/19 18:18, zhong jiang wrote:
On 2018/11/17 9:33, Wengang Wang wrote:
The this_cpu_cmpxchg makes the do-while loop pass as long as the
s->cpu_slab->partial as the same value. It doesn't care what happened to
that slab. Interrupt is not disabled, and new alloc/free can
Hi Zhong,
On 2018/11/19 18:18, zhong jiang wrote:
On 2018/11/17 9:33, Wengang Wang wrote:
The this_cpu_cmpxchg makes the do-while loop pass as long as the
s->cpu_slab->partial as the same value. It doesn't care what happened to
that slab. Interrupt is not disabled, and new alloc/free can
Hi Wei,
On 2018/11/17 17:02, Wei Yang wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 05:33:35PM -0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
The this_cpu_cmpxchg makes the do-while loop pass as long as the
s->cpu_slab->partial as the same value. It doesn't care what happened to
that slab. Interrupt is not disabled, and new
Hi Wei,
On 2018/11/17 17:02, Wei Yang wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 05:33:35PM -0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
The this_cpu_cmpxchg makes the do-while loop pass as long as the
s->cpu_slab->partial as the same value. It doesn't care what happened to
that slab. Interrupt is not disabled, and new
Hi Wengang,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
[also build test WARNING on v4.20-rc3 next-20181119]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Hi Wengang,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
[also build test WARNING on v4.20-rc3 next-20181119]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
On 2018/11/17 9:33, Wengang Wang wrote:
> The this_cpu_cmpxchg makes the do-while loop pass as long as the
> s->cpu_slab->partial as the same value. It doesn't care what happened to
> that slab. Interrupt is not disabled, and new alloc/free can happen in the
> interrupt handlers. Theoretically,
On 2018/11/17 9:33, Wengang Wang wrote:
> The this_cpu_cmpxchg makes the do-while loop pass as long as the
> s->cpu_slab->partial as the same value. It doesn't care what happened to
> that slab. Interrupt is not disabled, and new alloc/free can happen in the
> interrupt handlers. Theoretically,
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 05:33:35PM -0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
>The this_cpu_cmpxchg makes the do-while loop pass as long as the
>s->cpu_slab->partial as the same value. It doesn't care what happened to
>that slab. Interrupt is not disabled, and new alloc/free can happen in the
Well, I seems to
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 05:33:35PM -0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
>The this_cpu_cmpxchg makes the do-while loop pass as long as the
>s->cpu_slab->partial as the same value. It doesn't care what happened to
>that slab. Interrupt is not disabled, and new alloc/free can happen in the
Well, I seems to
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 05:33:35PM -0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
>The this_cpu_cmpxchg makes the do-while loop pass as long as the
>s->cpu_slab->partial as the same value. It doesn't care what happened to
>that slab. Interrupt is not disabled, and new alloc/free can happen in the
>interrupt handlers.
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 05:33:35PM -0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
>The this_cpu_cmpxchg makes the do-while loop pass as long as the
>s->cpu_slab->partial as the same value. It doesn't care what happened to
>that slab. Interrupt is not disabled, and new alloc/free can happen in the
>interrupt handlers.
30 matches
Mail list logo
