On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 13:09:51 +0200
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com> wrote:

> 8 bits opcodes should be followed by a single address cycle. Make the
> 2nd address cycle dependent of !nand_opcode_8bits(command).

Applied.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> index 0b0dc29..c2f83236 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> @@ -745,7 +745,10 @@ static void nand_command_lp(struct mtd_info *mtd, 
> unsigned int command,
>                               column >>= 1;
>                       chip->cmd_ctrl(mtd, column, ctrl);
>                       ctrl &= ~NAND_CTRL_CHANGE;
> -                     chip->cmd_ctrl(mtd, column >> 8, ctrl);
> +
> +                     /* Only ouput a single addr cycle for 8bits opcodes. */
> +                     if (!nand_opcode_8bits(command))
> +                             chip->cmd_ctrl(mtd, column >> 8, ctrl);
>               }
>               if (page_addr != -1) {
>                       chip->cmd_ctrl(mtd, page_addr, ctrl);

Reply via email to