Re: [PATCH] page_alloc: skip cpuset enforcement for lower zone allocations (v5)

2014-05-30 Thread Andi Kleen
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 08:50:56AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Thu, 29 May 2014, David Rientjes wrote: > > > When I said that my point about mempolicies needs more thought, I wasn't > > expecting that there would be no discussion -- at least _something_ that > > would say why we don't

Re: [PATCH] page_alloc: skip cpuset enforcement for lower zone allocations (v5)

2014-05-30 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Thu, 29 May 2014, David Rientjes wrote: > When I said that my point about mempolicies needs more thought, I wasn't > expecting that there would be no discussion -- at least _something_ that > would say why we don't care about the mempolicy case. Lets get Andi involved here too. > The

Re: [PATCH] page_alloc: skip cpuset enforcement for lower zone allocations (v5)

2014-05-30 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 04:54:00PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > On Thu, 29 May 2014, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c > > index 3d54c41..3bbc23f 100644 > > --- a/kernel/cpuset.c > > +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c > > @@ -2374,6 +2374,7 @@ static struct cpuset

Re: [PATCH] page_alloc: skip cpuset enforcement for lower zone allocations (v5)

2014-05-30 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 04:54:00PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2014, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c index 3d54c41..3bbc23f 100644 --- a/kernel/cpuset.c +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c @@ -2374,6 +2374,7 @@ static struct cpuset

Re: [PATCH] page_alloc: skip cpuset enforcement for lower zone allocations (v5)

2014-05-30 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Thu, 29 May 2014, David Rientjes wrote: When I said that my point about mempolicies needs more thought, I wasn't expecting that there would be no discussion -- at least _something_ that would say why we don't care about the mempolicy case. Lets get Andi involved here too. The motivation

Re: [PATCH] page_alloc: skip cpuset enforcement for lower zone allocations (v5)

2014-05-30 Thread Andi Kleen
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 08:50:56AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2014, David Rientjes wrote: When I said that my point about mempolicies needs more thought, I wasn't expecting that there would be no discussion -- at least _something_ that would say why we don't care about

Re: [PATCH] page_alloc: skip cpuset enforcement for lower zone allocations (v5)

2014-05-29 Thread David Rientjes
On Thu, 29 May 2014, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c > index 3d54c41..3bbc23f 100644 > --- a/kernel/cpuset.c > +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c > @@ -2374,6 +2374,7 @@ static struct cpuset *nearest_hardwall_ancestor(struct > cpuset *cs) > * variable 'wait' is not

Re: [PATCH] page_alloc: skip cpuset enforcement for lower zone allocations (v5)

2014-05-29 Thread David Rientjes
On Thu, 29 May 2014, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c index 3d54c41..3bbc23f 100644 --- a/kernel/cpuset.c +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c @@ -2374,6 +2374,7 @@ static struct cpuset *nearest_hardwall_ancestor(struct cpuset *cs) * variable 'wait' is not set, and