Re: [PATCH] pwm: Convert to using %pOF instead of full_name

2017-08-20 Thread Thierry Reding
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 05:12:55PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 6:38 AM, Thierry Reding > wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:43:25PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > >> Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of > >> full_name to use %pOF instead. This

Re: [PATCH] pwm: Convert to using %pOF instead of full_name

2017-08-09 Thread Rob Herring
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 6:38 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:43:25PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >> Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of >> full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing >> of the full path string for each n

Re: [PATCH] pwm: Convert to using %pOF instead of full_name

2017-07-25 Thread Thierry Reding
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:43:25PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of > full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing > of the full path string for each node. > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring > Cc: Thierry Reding >

Re: [PATCH] pwm: Convert to using %pOF instead of full_name

2017-07-24 Thread Neil Armstrong
On 07/18/2017 11:43 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of > full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing > of the full path string for each node. > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring > Cc: Thierry Reding > Cc: Carlo Caione