On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 11:12:56AM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
> Here would it not make sense to go slightly further and basically
> revert my original change. This feels sensible as it keeps it at
> only one location where the mutex is unlocked and removes the
> second exit point I added. This
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 04:04:09PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> When regulator_register() failed due to non availability of
> mutex_unlock(_list_mutex);
...
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(regulator_put);
> @@ -3453,11 +3460,10 @@ scrub:
> gpio_free(rdev->ena_gpio);
>
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 04:04:09PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
When regulator_register() failed due to non availability of
mutex_unlock(regulator_list_mutex);
...
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(regulator_put);
@@ -3453,11 +3460,10 @@ scrub:
gpio_free(rdev-ena_gpio);
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 11:12:56AM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
Here would it not make sense to go slightly further and basically
revert my original change. This feels sensible as it keeps it at
only one location where the mutex is unlocked and removes the
second exit point I added. This
4 matches
Mail list logo