On Sat, Jun 28, 2025 at 07:39:45PM +0800, wang lian wrote:
> This patch adds tests for the process_madvise(), focusing on
> verifying behavior under various conditions including valid
> usage and error cases.
Hi sorry to be a pain, but I'm not sure this will get picked up properly like
this.
Please resend this _not in reply to anything_ and with the subject:
[PATCH v2] selftests/mm: add process_madvise() tests
Note we do not capitalise the first letter in the subject line.
>
> Changelog v2:
> - Drop MADV_DONTNEED tests based on feedback
> - Focus solely on process_madvise() syscall
> - Improve error handling and structure
> - Add future-proof flag test
> - Style and comment cleanups
>
^ This is good but please put changelogs under the --- below, otherwise they end
up as part of the commit msg which isn't appropriate.
Once you do that we can review in reply to the new email.
Thanks!
> Signed-off-by: wang lian
> Suggested-by: Lorenzo Stoakes
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/.gitignore | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/process_madv.c | 414 ++
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh | 5 +
> 4 files changed, 421 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/mm/process_madv.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/.gitignore
> b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/.gitignore
> index 911f39d634be..a8c3be02188c 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/.gitignore
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/.gitignore
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ memfd_secret
> hugetlb_dio
> pkey_sighandler_tests_32
> pkey_sighandler_tests_64
> +process_madv
> soft-dirty
> split_huge_page_test
> ksm_tests
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
> b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
> index 2352252f3914..725612e09582 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
> @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ TEST_GEN_FILES += mseal_test
> TEST_GEN_FILES += on-fault-limit
> TEST_GEN_FILES += pagemap_ioctl
> TEST_GEN_FILES += pfnmap
> +TEST_GEN_FILES += process_madv
> TEST_GEN_FILES += thuge-gen
> TEST_GEN_FILES += transhuge-stress
> TEST_GEN_FILES += uffd-stress
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/process_madv.c
> b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/process_madv.c
> new file mode 100644
> index ..73999c8e3570
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/process_madv.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,414 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +
> +#define _GNU_SOURCE
> +#include "../kselftest_harness.h"
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include "vm_util.h"
> +
> +#include "../pidfd/pidfd.h"
> +
> +/*
> + * Ignore the checkpatch warning, as per the C99 standard, section 7.14.1.1:
> + *
> + * "If the signal occurs other than as the result of calling the abort or
> raise
> + * function, the behavior is undefined if the signal handler refers to any
> + * object with static storage duration other than by assigning a value to an
> + * object declared as volatile sig_atomic_t"
> + */
> +static volatile sig_atomic_t signal_jump_set;
> +static sigjmp_buf signal_jmp_buf;
> +
> +/*
> + * Ignore the checkpatch warning, we must read from x but don't want to do
> + * anything with it in order to trigger a read page fault. We therefore must
> use
> + * volatile to stop the compiler from optimising this away.
> + */
> +#define FORCE_READ(x) (*(volatile typeof(x) *)x)
> +
> +static void handle_fatal(int c)
> +{
> + if (!signal_jump_set)
> + return;
> +
> + siglongjmp(signal_jmp_buf, c);
> +}
> +
> +FIXTURE(process_madvise)
> +{
> + int pidfd;
> + int flag;
> +};
> +
> +static void setup_sighandler(void)
> +{
> + struct sigaction act = {
> + .sa_handler = &handle_fatal,
> + .sa_flags = SA_NODEFER,
> + };
> +
> + sigemptyset(&act.sa_mask);
> + if (sigaction(SIGSEGV, &act, NULL))
> + ksft_exit_fail_perror("sigaction");
> +}
> +
> +static void teardown_sighandler(void)
> +{
> + struct sigaction act = {
> + .sa_handler = SIG_DFL,
> + .sa_flags = SA_NODEFER,
> + };
> +
> + sigemptyset(&act.sa_mask);
> + sigaction(SIGSEGV, &act, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +FIXTURE_SETUP(process_madvise)
> +{
> + self->pidfd = PIDFD_SELF;
> + self->flag = 0;
> + setup_sighandler();
> +};
> +
> +FIXTURE_TEARDOWN_PARENT(process_madvise)
> +{
> + teardown_sighandler();
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t sys_process_madvise(int pidfd, const struct iovec *iovec,
> +size_t vlen, int advice, unsigned int flags)
> +{
> + return syscall(__NR_process_madvise, pidfd, iovec, vlen, advice, flags);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Enable our signal catcher and try to read/write the specified buffer. The
> + * return value indicates
