On Thu, 8 Mar 2018, Chintan Pandya wrote:
> > If you print the raw value, then you can do the subtraction yourself;
> > if you've subtracted it from jiffies each time, you've at least introduced
> > jitter, and possibly enough jitter to confuse and mislead.
> >
> This is exactly what I was
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018, Chintan Pandya wrote:
> > If you print the raw value, then you can do the subtraction yourself;
> > if you've subtracted it from jiffies each time, you've at least introduced
> > jitter, and possibly enough jitter to confuse and mislead.
> >
> This is exactly what I was
On 3/7/2018 11:52 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 12:13:56PM -0600, Christopher Lameter wrote:
On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Chintan Pandya wrote:
In this case, object got freed later but 'age' shows
otherwise. This could be because, while printing
this info, we print allocation
On 3/7/2018 11:52 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 12:13:56PM -0600, Christopher Lameter wrote:
On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Chintan Pandya wrote:
In this case, object got freed later but 'age' shows
otherwise. This could be because, while printing
this info, we print allocation
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 12:13:56PM -0600, Christopher Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Chintan Pandya wrote:
> > In this case, object got freed later but 'age' shows
> > otherwise. This could be because, while printing
> > this info, we print allocation traces first and
> > free traces
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 12:13:56PM -0600, Christopher Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Chintan Pandya wrote:
> > In this case, object got freed later but 'age' shows
> > otherwise. This could be because, while printing
> > this info, we print allocation traces first and
> > free traces
On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Chintan Pandya wrote:
> In this case, object got freed later but 'age' shows
> otherwise. This could be because, while printing
> this info, we print allocation traces first and
> free traces thereafter. In between, if we get schedule
> out, (jiffies - t->when) could become
On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Chintan Pandya wrote:
> In this case, object got freed later but 'age' shows
> otherwise. This could be because, while printing
> this info, we print allocation traces first and
> free traces thereafter. In between, if we get schedule
> out, (jiffies - t->when) could become
8 matches
Mail list logo
