Re: [PATCH] staging: iio/meter: add name to function definition arguments

[Rodrigo Siqueira]

Hi Jonathan,

> On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:16:58 -0200
> Rodrigo Siqueira  wrote:
> 
> > Hi Daniel
> > 
> > > Hi Rodrigo,
> > > 
> > > I think this is a nice finding. One comment inline:
> > > 
> > > On Vi, 2018-02-16 at 10:50 -0200, rodrigosiqueira wrote:  
> > > > This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl warning:
> > > > 
> > > > drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7854.h:157: WARNING: function definition
> > > > argument 'struct device *' should also have an identifier name...
> > > > 
> > > > +   int (*read_reg_32)(struct device *dev, u16 reg_address, u32 
> > > > *val);
> > > > +   int (*write_reg_8)(struct device *dev, u16 reg_address, u8 
> > > > value);  
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Any particular reason for using val vs value? I get that one is a pointer
> > > and another a plain type, but I think the name should be the same.  
> > 
> > Before I selected the name, I figure out that read_reg_* and write_reg_*
> > was assigned inside the iio/meter/ade7754-(i2c|spi).c files by function
> > like ade7754_*_read_reg_* and ade7754_*_write_reg_* .
> > 
> > I considered to use 'value' name for both functions parameters, however,
> > I noticed that function ade7754_*_write_reg_* adopted the name 'value'
> > for the last argument and ade7754_*_read_reg_* named the last argument
> > as 'val'. So, for consistency sake between the header file and the c
> > code, I decided to use the same parameter name patterns.
> > 
> Hohum. It isn't even that consistent ;)
> 
> ade7754_write_reg_8 uses val and ade7754_write_reg_16 uses value.
> 
> I would suggest another patch to make them all val.

Thanks for the review. I will send another patch as you recommended.

Rodrigo Siqueira
 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jonathan
> > 
> > > thanks,
> > > Daniel.
> > >  
> > 
> > Thanks 
> 

Re: [PATCH] staging: iio/meter: add name to function definition arguments

[Rodrigo Siqueira]

Hi Jonathan,

> On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:16:58 -0200
> Rodrigo Siqueira  wrote:
> 
> > Hi Daniel
> > 
> > > Hi Rodrigo,
> > > 
> > > I think this is a nice finding. One comment inline:
> > > 
> > > On Vi, 2018-02-16 at 10:50 -0200, rodrigosiqueira wrote:  
> > > > This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl warning:
> > > > 
> > > > drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7854.h:157: WARNING: function definition
> > > > argument 'struct device *' should also have an identifier name...
> > > > 
> > > > +   int (*read_reg_32)(struct device *dev, u16 reg_address, u32 
> > > > *val);
> > > > +   int (*write_reg_8)(struct device *dev, u16 reg_address, u8 
> > > > value);  
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Any particular reason for using val vs value? I get that one is a pointer
> > > and another a plain type, but I think the name should be the same.  
> > 
> > Before I selected the name, I figure out that read_reg_* and write_reg_*
> > was assigned inside the iio/meter/ade7754-(i2c|spi).c files by function
> > like ade7754_*_read_reg_* and ade7754_*_write_reg_* .
> > 
> > I considered to use 'value' name for both functions parameters, however,
> > I noticed that function ade7754_*_write_reg_* adopted the name 'value'
> > for the last argument and ade7754_*_read_reg_* named the last argument
> > as 'val'. So, for consistency sake between the header file and the c
> > code, I decided to use the same parameter name patterns.
> > 
> Hohum. It isn't even that consistent ;)
> 
> ade7754_write_reg_8 uses val and ade7754_write_reg_16 uses value.
> 
> I would suggest another patch to make them all val.

Thanks for the review. I will send another patch as you recommended.

Rodrigo Siqueira
 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jonathan
> > 
> > > thanks,
> > > Daniel.
> > >  
> > 
> > Thanks 
> 

Re: [PATCH] staging: iio/meter: add name to function definition arguments

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:16:58 -0200
Rodrigo Siqueira  wrote:

> Hi Daniel
> 
> > Hi Rodrigo,
> > 
> > I think this is a nice finding. One comment inline:
> > 
> > On Vi, 2018-02-16 at 10:50 -0200, rodrigosiqueira wrote:  
> > > This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl warning:
> > > 
> > > drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7854.h:157: WARNING: function definition
> > > argument 'struct device *' should also have an identifier name...
> > > 
> > > + int (*read_reg_32)(struct device *dev, u16 reg_address, u32 *val);
> > > + int (*write_reg_8)(struct device *dev, u16 reg_address, u8 value);  
> > 
> > 
> > Any particular reason for using val vs value? I get that one is a pointer
> > and another a plain type, but I think the name should be the same.  
> 
> Before I selected the name, I figure out that read_reg_* and write_reg_*
> was assigned inside the iio/meter/ade7754-(i2c|spi).c files by function
> like ade7754_*_read_reg_* and ade7754_*_write_reg_* .
> 
> I considered to use 'value' name for both functions parameters, however,
> I noticed that function ade7754_*_write_reg_* adopted the name 'value'
> for the last argument and ade7754_*_read_reg_* named the last argument
> as 'val'. So, for consistency sake between the header file and the c
> code, I decided to use the same parameter name patterns.
> 
Hohum. It isn't even that consistent ;)

ade7754_write_reg_8 uses val and ade7754_write_reg_16 uses value.

I would suggest another patch to make them all val.

Thanks,

Jonathan
> 
> > thanks,
> > Daniel.
> >  
> 
> Thanks 

Re: [PATCH] staging: iio/meter: add name to function definition arguments

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:16:58 -0200
Rodrigo Siqueira  wrote:

> Hi Daniel
> 
> > Hi Rodrigo,
> > 
> > I think this is a nice finding. One comment inline:
> > 
> > On Vi, 2018-02-16 at 10:50 -0200, rodrigosiqueira wrote:  
> > > This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl warning:
> > > 
> > > drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7854.h:157: WARNING: function definition
> > > argument 'struct device *' should also have an identifier name...
> > > 
> > > + int (*read_reg_32)(struct device *dev, u16 reg_address, u32 *val);
> > > + int (*write_reg_8)(struct device *dev, u16 reg_address, u8 value);  
> > 
> > 
> > Any particular reason for using val vs value? I get that one is a pointer
> > and another a plain type, but I think the name should be the same.  
> 
> Before I selected the name, I figure out that read_reg_* and write_reg_*
> was assigned inside the iio/meter/ade7754-(i2c|spi).c files by function
> like ade7754_*_read_reg_* and ade7754_*_write_reg_* .
> 
> I considered to use 'value' name for both functions parameters, however,
> I noticed that function ade7754_*_write_reg_* adopted the name 'value'
> for the last argument and ade7754_*_read_reg_* named the last argument
> as 'val'. So, for consistency sake between the header file and the c
> code, I decided to use the same parameter name patterns.
> 
Hohum. It isn't even that consistent ;)

ade7754_write_reg_8 uses val and ade7754_write_reg_16 uses value.

I would suggest another patch to make them all val.

Thanks,

Jonathan
> 
> > thanks,
> > Daniel.
> >  
> 
> Thanks 

Re: [PATCH] staging: iio/meter: add name to function definition arguments

[Rodrigo Siqueira]

Hi Daniel

> Hi Rodrigo,
> 
> I think this is a nice finding. One comment inline:
> 
> On Vi, 2018-02-16 at 10:50 -0200, rodrigosiqueira wrote:
> > This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl warning:
> > 
> > drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7854.h:157: WARNING: function definition
> > argument 'struct device *' should also have an identifier name...
> > 
> > +   int (*read_reg_32)(struct device *dev, u16 reg_address, u32 *val);
> > +   int (*write_reg_8)(struct device *dev, u16 reg_address, u8 value);
> 
> 
> Any particular reason for using val vs value? I get that one is a pointer
> and another a plain type, but I think the name should be the same.

Before I selected the name, I figure out that read_reg_* and write_reg_*
was assigned inside the iio/meter/ade7754-(i2c|spi).c files by function
like ade7754_*_read_reg_* and ade7754_*_write_reg_* .

I considered to use 'value' name for both functions parameters, however,
I noticed that function ade7754_*_write_reg_* adopted the name 'value'
for the last argument and ade7754_*_read_reg_* named the last argument
as 'val'. So, for consistency sake between the header file and the c
code, I decided to use the same parameter name patterns.


> thanks,
> Daniel.
>

Thanks 

Re: [PATCH] staging: iio/meter: add name to function definition arguments

[Rodrigo Siqueira]

Hi Daniel

> Hi Rodrigo,
> 
> I think this is a nice finding. One comment inline:
> 
> On Vi, 2018-02-16 at 10:50 -0200, rodrigosiqueira wrote:
> > This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl warning:
> > 
> > drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7854.h:157: WARNING: function definition
> > argument 'struct device *' should also have an identifier name...
> > 
> > +   int (*read_reg_32)(struct device *dev, u16 reg_address, u32 *val);
> > +   int (*write_reg_8)(struct device *dev, u16 reg_address, u8 value);
> 
> 
> Any particular reason for using val vs value? I get that one is a pointer
> and another a plain type, but I think the name should be the same.

Before I selected the name, I figure out that read_reg_* and write_reg_*
was assigned inside the iio/meter/ade7754-(i2c|spi).c files by function
like ade7754_*_read_reg_* and ade7754_*_write_reg_* .

I considered to use 'value' name for both functions parameters, however,
I noticed that function ade7754_*_write_reg_* adopted the name 'value'
for the last argument and ade7754_*_read_reg_* named the last argument
as 'val'. So, for consistency sake between the header file and the c
code, I decided to use the same parameter name patterns.


> thanks,
> Daniel.
>

Thanks 

Re: [PATCH] staging: iio/meter: add name to function definition arguments

[Daniel Baluta]

Hi Rodrigo,

I think this is a nice finding. One comment inline:

On Vi, 2018-02-16 at 10:50 -0200, rodrigosiqueira wrote:
> This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl warning:
> 
> drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7854.h:157: WARNING: function definition
> argument 'struct device *' should also have an identifier name...
> 
> + int (*read_reg_32)(struct device *dev, u16 reg_address, u32 *val);
> + int (*write_reg_8)(struct device *dev, u16 reg_address, u8 value);


Any particular reason for using val vs value? I get that one is a pointer
and another a plain type, but I think the name should be the same.

thanks,
Daniel.

Re: [PATCH] staging: iio/meter: add name to function definition arguments

[Daniel Baluta]

Hi Rodrigo,

I think this is a nice finding. One comment inline:

On Vi, 2018-02-16 at 10:50 -0200, rodrigosiqueira wrote:
> This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl warning:
> 
> drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7854.h:157: WARNING: function definition
> argument 'struct device *' should also have an identifier name...
> 
> + int (*read_reg_32)(struct device *dev, u16 reg_address, u32 *val);
> + int (*write_reg_8)(struct device *dev, u16 reg_address, u8 value);


Any particular reason for using val vs value? I get that one is a pointer
and another a plain type, but I think the name should be the same.

thanks,
Daniel.