Re: [PATCH] stm class: Document the stm_ftrace

2017-03-21 Thread Chunyan Zhang
On 21 March 2017 at 15:33, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > On 21 March 2017 at 07:57, Chunyan Zhang wrote: >> On 20 March 2017 at 19:09, Alexander Shishkin >> wrote: >>> Chunyan Zhang

Re: [PATCH] stm class: Document the stm_ftrace

2017-03-21 Thread Chunyan Zhang
On 21 March 2017 at 15:33, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > On 21 March 2017 at 07:57, Chunyan Zhang wrote: >> On 20 March 2017 at 19:09, Alexander Shishkin >> wrote: >>> Chunyan Zhang writes: >>> Hi Alex, On 20 March 2017 at 16:49, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > Hi Chunyan,

Re: [PATCH] stm class: Document the stm_ftrace

2017-03-21 Thread Alexander Shishkin
On 21 March 2017 at 07:57, Chunyan Zhang wrote: > On 20 March 2017 at 19:09, Alexander Shishkin > wrote: >> Chunyan Zhang writes: >> >>> Hi Alex, >>> >>> On 20 March 2017 at 16:49, Alexander Shishkin >>>

Re: [PATCH] stm class: Document the stm_ftrace

2017-03-21 Thread Alexander Shishkin
On 21 March 2017 at 07:57, Chunyan Zhang wrote: > On 20 March 2017 at 19:09, Alexander Shishkin > wrote: >> Chunyan Zhang writes: >> >>> Hi Alex, >>> >>> On 20 March 2017 at 16:49, Alexander Shishkin >>> wrote: Hi Chunyan, A couple of clarifications: iirc this applies to the

Re: [PATCH] stm class: Document the stm_ftrace

2017-03-21 Thread Chunyan Zhang
On 20 March 2017 at 19:09, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > Chunyan Zhang writes: > >> Hi Alex, >> >> On 20 March 2017 at 16:49, Alexander Shishkin >> wrote: >>> Hi Chunyan, >>> >>> A couple of

Re: [PATCH] stm class: Document the stm_ftrace

2017-03-21 Thread Chunyan Zhang
On 20 March 2017 at 19:09, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > Chunyan Zhang writes: > >> Hi Alex, >> >> On 20 March 2017 at 16:49, Alexander Shishkin >> wrote: >>> Hi Chunyan, >>> >>> A couple of clarifications: iirc this applies to the function tracer >>> of ftrace, right? Does it make sense to

Re: [PATCH] stm class: Document the stm_ftrace

2017-03-20 Thread Alexander Shishkin
Chunyan Zhang writes: > Hi Alex, > > On 20 March 2017 at 16:49, Alexander Shishkin > wrote: >> Hi Chunyan, >> >> A couple of clarifications: iirc this applies to the function tracer >> of ftrace, right? Does it make sense to mention

Re: [PATCH] stm class: Document the stm_ftrace

2017-03-20 Thread Alexander Shishkin
Chunyan Zhang writes: > Hi Alex, > > On 20 March 2017 at 16:49, Alexander Shishkin > wrote: >> Hi Chunyan, >> >> A couple of clarifications: iirc this applies to the function tracer >> of ftrace, right? Does it make sense to mention that? Also, are you > > Right, only applies to the function

Re: [PATCH] stm class: Document the stm_ftrace

2017-03-20 Thread Chunyan Zhang
Hi Alex, On 20 March 2017 at 16:49, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > Hi Chunyan, > > A couple of clarifications: iirc this applies to the function tracer > of ftrace, right? Does it make sense to mention that? Also, are you Right, only applies to the function

Re: [PATCH] stm class: Document the stm_ftrace

2017-03-20 Thread Chunyan Zhang
Hi Alex, On 20 March 2017 at 16:49, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > Hi Chunyan, > > A couple of clarifications: iirc this applies to the function tracer > of ftrace, right? Does it make sense to mention that? Also, are you Right, only applies to the function tracer currently (actually only function

Re: [PATCH] stm class: Document the stm_ftrace

2017-03-20 Thread Alexander Shishkin
Hi Chunyan, A couple of clarifications: iirc this applies to the function tracer of ftrace, right? Does it make sense to mention that? Also, are you planning to support other ftrace payloads like trace_printk()s? Thanks, -- Alex On 20 March 2017 at 08:47, Chunyan Zhang

Re: [PATCH] stm class: Document the stm_ftrace

2017-03-20 Thread Alexander Shishkin
Hi Chunyan, A couple of clarifications: iirc this applies to the function tracer of ftrace, right? Does it make sense to mention that? Also, are you planning to support other ftrace payloads like trace_printk()s? Thanks, -- Alex On 20 March 2017 at 08:47, Chunyan Zhang wrote: > This patch adds