On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, dl...@gmx.de wrote:
> From: Behan Webster
> The only real change is passing in event_mask to the formerly nested
> functions.
> Otherwise it's just moving around function and macro code.
>
> This is the only place in the Linux kernel where nested functions are still in
>
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, dl...@gmx.de wrote:
From: Behan Webster beh...@converseincode.com
The only real change is passing in event_mask to the formerly nested
functions.
Otherwise it's just moving around function and macro code.
This is the only place in the Linux kernel where nested
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 01:54:43PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> So this patch is only as a courtesy to clang and you're not complaining
> about things like __builtin() functions, typeof, or a ? : b conditional
> operators because clang happens to support them?
That patch removes a disgusting
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, dl...@gmx.de wrote:
> From: Behan Webster
>
> The only real change is passing in event_mask to the formerly nested
> functions.
> Otherwise it's just moving around function and macro code.
>
> This is the only place in the Linux kernel where nested functions are still in
Behan Webster writes:
> On 02/12/14 13:11, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:58:46PM +0100, dl...@gmx.de wrote:
>>> being able to compile the Linux kernel with Clang. The use of nested
>>> functions
>>> blocks this effort.
>> Is there any good way to make gcc warn about the
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Behan Webster
wrote:
> On 02/12/14 13:11, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:58:46PM +0100, dl...@gmx.de wrote:
>>>
>>> being able to compile the Linux kernel with Clang. The use of nested
>>> functions
>>> blocks this effort.
>>
>> Is
On 02/12/14 13:11, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:58:46PM +0100, dl...@gmx.de wrote:
being able to compile the Linux kernel with Clang. The use of nested functions
blocks this effort.
Is there any good way to make gcc warn about the use of nested functions?
Interesting
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:58:46PM +0100, dl...@gmx.de wrote:
> being able to compile the Linux kernel with Clang. The use of nested functions
> blocks this effort.
Is there any good way to make gcc warn about the use of nested functions?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:58:46PM +0100, dl...@gmx.de wrote:
being able to compile the Linux kernel with Clang. The use of nested functions
blocks this effort.
Is there any good way to make gcc warn about the use of nested functions?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On 02/12/14 13:11, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:58:46PM +0100, dl...@gmx.de wrote:
being able to compile the Linux kernel with Clang. The use of nested functions
blocks this effort.
Is there any good way to make gcc warn about the use of nested functions?
Interesting
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Behan Webster
beh...@converseincode.com wrote:
On 02/12/14 13:11, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:58:46PM +0100, dl...@gmx.de wrote:
being able to compile the Linux kernel with Clang. The use of nested
functions
blocks this effort.
Is
Behan Webster beh...@converseincode.com writes:
On 02/12/14 13:11, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:58:46PM +0100, dl...@gmx.de wrote:
being able to compile the Linux kernel with Clang. The use of nested
functions
blocks this effort.
Is there any good way to make gcc
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, dl...@gmx.de wrote:
From: Behan Webster beh...@converseincode.com
The only real change is passing in event_mask to the formerly nested
functions.
Otherwise it's just moving around function and macro code.
This is the only place in the Linux kernel where nested
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 01:54:43PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
So this patch is only as a courtesy to clang and you're not complaining
about things like __builtin() functions, typeof, or a ? : b conditional
operators because clang happens to support them?
That patch removes a disgusting
14 matches
Mail list logo
