On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 05:36:03PM +, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > So the real question is, is there a signifcant class of MCE events that
> > are not tied to the reporting channel which is per CPU (-ish ...) MCA
> > banks?
>
> Perhaps QPI/UPI interconnect errors?
Whatever, this is pure
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 05:36:03PM +, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > So the real question is, is there a signifcant class of MCE events that
> > are not tied to the reporting channel which is per CPU (-ish ...) MCA
> > banks?
>
> Perhaps QPI/UPI interconnect errors?
Whatever, this is pure
> So the real question is, is there a signifcant class of MCE events that
> are not tied to the reporting channel which is per CPU (-ish ...) MCA
> banks?
Perhaps QPI/UPI interconnect errors?
-Tony
> So the real question is, is there a signifcant class of MCE events that
> are not tied to the reporting channel which is per CPU (-ish ...) MCA
> banks?
Perhaps QPI/UPI interconnect errors?
-Tony
* Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 07:01:58PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Oh - I thought we'd have arch/x86/mce/ or so?
> >
> > There's machine check events that are not tied to any particular CPU,
> > correct? So this would be the right conceptual level - and it would also
* Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 07:01:58PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Oh - I thought we'd have arch/x86/mce/ or so?
> >
> > There's machine check events that are not tied to any particular CPU,
> > correct? So this would be the right conceptual level - and it would also
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 07:01:58PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Oh - I thought we'd have arch/x86/mce/ or so?
>
> There's machine check events that are not tied to any particular CPU,
> correct? So this would be the right conceptual level - and it would also
> remove the somewhat redundant
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 07:01:58PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Oh - I thought we'd have arch/x86/mce/ or so?
>
> There's machine check events that are not tied to any particular CPU,
> correct? So this would be the right conceptual level - and it would also
> remove the somewhat redundant
* Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 05:30:37PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Would it make sense to organize it a bit more and separate out vendor
> > specific functionality:
> >
> > mce/cpu/intel.c
> > mce/cpu/intel-p5.c
> > mce/cpu/amd.c
> > mce/cpu/winchip.c
>
>
* Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 05:30:37PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Would it make sense to organize it a bit more and separate out vendor
> > specific functionality:
> >
> > mce/cpu/intel.c
> > mce/cpu/intel-p5.c
> > mce/cpu/amd.c
> > mce/cpu/winchip.c
>
>
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 05:30:37PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Would it make sense to organize it a bit more and separate out vendor
> specific functionality:
>
> mce/cpu/intel.c
> mce/cpu/intel-p5.c
> mce/cpu/amd.c
> mce/cpu/winchip.c
That's too fine-grained IMO and look at the path
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 05:30:37PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Would it make sense to organize it a bit more and separate out vendor
> specific functionality:
>
> mce/cpu/intel.c
> mce/cpu/intel-p5.c
> mce/cpu/amd.c
> mce/cpu/winchip.c
That's too fine-grained IMO and look at the path
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 03:13:23PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov
>
> Rename the containing folder to "mce" which is the most widespread name.
> Drop the "mce[-_]" filename prefix of some compilation units (while
> others don't have it).
>
> This unifies the file naming
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 03:13:23PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov
>
> Rename the containing folder to "mce" which is the most widespread name.
> Drop the "mce[-_]" filename prefix of some compilation units (while
> others don't have it).
>
> This unifies the file naming
* Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov
>
> Rename the containing folder to "mce" which is the most widespread name.
> Drop the "mce[-_]" filename prefix of some compilation units (while
> others don't have it).
>
> This unifies the file naming in the MCE subsystem:
>
> mce/
> |--
* Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov
>
> Rename the containing folder to "mce" which is the most widespread name.
> Drop the "mce[-_]" filename prefix of some compilation units (while
> others don't have it).
>
> This unifies the file naming in the MCE subsystem:
>
> mce/
> |--
16 matches
Mail list logo
