On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 04:22:00PM +0100, Artem Savkov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 08:23:12AM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 02:51:33PM +0100, Artem Savkov wrote:
> > > In case when the number of entries in the section header table is larger
> > > then or equal to
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 04:22:00PM +0100, Artem Savkov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 08:23:12AM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 02:51:33PM +0100, Artem Savkov wrote:
> > > In case when the number of entries in the section header table is larger
> > > then or equal to
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 08:23:12AM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 02:51:33PM +0100, Artem Savkov wrote:
> > In case when the number of entries in the section header table is larger
> > then or equal to SHN_LORESERVE the size of the table is held in the sh_size
> > member of
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 08:23:12AM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 02:51:33PM +0100, Artem Savkov wrote:
> > In case when the number of entries in the section header table is larger
> > then or equal to SHN_LORESERVE the size of the table is held in the sh_size
> > member of
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 02:51:33PM +0100, Artem Savkov wrote:
> In case when the number of entries in the section header table is larger
> then or equal to SHN_LORESERVE the size of the table is held in the sh_size
> member of the initial entry in section header table instead of e_shnum.
> Same
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 02:51:33PM +0100, Artem Savkov wrote:
> In case when the number of entries in the section header table is larger
> then or equal to SHN_LORESERVE the size of the table is held in the sh_size
> member of the initial entry in section header table instead of e_shnum.
> Same
6 matches
Mail list logo