Re: [PATCH 0/2] PCI/AER: Remove module parameters

2016-09-19 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
; Khan <shua...@osg.samsung.com>; Huang, Ying <ying.hu...@intel.com>; > > Vijay Mohan Pandarathil <vijaymohan.pandarat...@hpe.com>; Derrick, > > Jonathan <jonathan.derr...@intel.com> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] PCI/AER: Remove module parameters > > >

Re: [PATCH 0/2] PCI/AER: Remove module parameters

2016-09-19 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
Chen Gong ; keithbuschkeith.bu...@intel.com; > > Rafael J. Wysocki ; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Shuah > > Khan ; Huang, Ying ; > > Vijay Mohan Pandarathil ; Derrick, > > Jonathan > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] PCI/AER: Remove module parameters > >

RE: [PATCH 0/2] PCI/AER: Remove module parameters

2016-09-16 Thread Tang, CQ
g.com>; Huang, Ying <ying.hu...@intel.com>; > Vijay Mohan Pandarathil <vijaymohan.pandarat...@hpe.com>; Derrick, > Jonathan <jonathan.derr...@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] PCI/AER: Remove module parameters > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 05:19:22PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

RE: [PATCH 0/2] PCI/AER: Remove module parameters

2016-09-16 Thread Tang, CQ
..@intel.com; > Rafael J. Wysocki ; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Shuah > Khan ; Huang, Ying ; > Vijay Mohan Pandarathil ; Derrick, > Jonathan > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] PCI/AER: Remove module parameters > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 05:19:22PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: &g

Re: [PATCH 0/2] PCI/AER: Remove module parameters

2016-09-14 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 05:19:22PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > I'd like to remove the aerdriver.nosourceid and aerdriver.forceload kernel > parameters. They seem like basically debugging things that are not really > supportable upstream. > > "nosourceid" may have some legitimate uses, but I'd

Re: [PATCH 0/2] PCI/AER: Remove module parameters

2016-09-14 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 05:19:22PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > I'd like to remove the aerdriver.nosourceid and aerdriver.forceload kernel > parameters. They seem like basically debugging things that are not really > supportable upstream. > > "nosourceid" may have some legitimate uses, but I'd