Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 2017-02-20 02:33, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > > > On 19/02/17 13:33, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> I would not object strongly to having conditionally compiled code in >>> mainline that adds support for this, but bodging the default code path >>> like this for a Quark quirk is out of the question imo.

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 2017-02-20 02:33, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > > > On 19/02/17 13:33, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> I would not object strongly to having conditionally compiled code in >>> mainline that adds support for this, but bodging the default code path >>> like this for a Quark quirk is out of the question imo.

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: >>> So, summarize, you state that >>> 1. CONFIG_SMP=y and >>> 2. CONFIG_M686=y and >>> 3. Kernel works on Quark >>> >>> Is it correct? >> Logically yes. It's a very long time since I looked in detail. No harm

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: >>> So, summarize, you state that >>> 1. CONFIG_SMP=y and >>> 2. CONFIG_M686=y and >>> 3. Kernel works on Quark >>> >>> Is it correct? >> Logically yes. It's a very long time since I looked in detail. No harm >> in checking it out though.

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 28/02/17 17:42, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: On 28/02/17 17:18, Andy Shevchenko wrote: On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue A kernel compiled like this make menuconfig ARCH=i386 I hope you care that it is equivalent to make menuconfig ARCH=i686 make bzImage -j 8 will run

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 28/02/17 17:42, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: On 28/02/17 17:18, Andy Shevchenko wrote: On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue A kernel compiled like this make menuconfig ARCH=i386 I hope you care that it is equivalent to make menuconfig ARCH=i686 make bzImage -j 8 will run

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 28/02/17 17:18, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue >> A kernel compiled like this >> >> make menuconfig ARCH=i386 > > I hope you care that it is equivalent to > > make menuconfig ARCH=i686 > >> make bzImage -j 8 >> >> will run just fine on Quark x1000

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 28/02/17 17:18, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue >> A kernel compiled like this >> >> make menuconfig ARCH=i386 > > I hope you care that it is equivalent to > > make menuconfig ARCH=i686 > >> make bzImage -j 8 >> >> will run just fine on Quark x1000

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 28/02/17 15:27, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue > wrote: >> On 28/02/17 13:36, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Andy Shevchenko >>> wrote: On Tue, Feb 28, 2017

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 28/02/17 15:27, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue > wrote: >> On 28/02/17 13:36, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Andy Shevchenko >>> wrote: On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 28

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > On 28/02/17 15:27, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue >> wrote: >>> On 28/02/17 13:36, Andy Shevchenko wrote: On Tue, Feb 28, 2017

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > On 28/02/17 15:27, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue >> wrote: >>> On 28/02/17 13:36, Andy Shevchenko wrote: On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Feb

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > On 28/02/17 13:36, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Andy Shevchenko >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Ard Biesheuvel >>>

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > On 28/02/17 13:36, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Andy Shevchenko >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Ard Biesheuvel >>> wrote: On 28 February 2017 at 12:29, Matt Fleming wrote: >

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 28/02/17 13:36, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Andy Shevchenko > wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Ard Biesheuvel >> wrote: >>> On 28 February 2017 at 12:29, Matt Fleming

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 28/02/17 13:36, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Andy Shevchenko > wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Ard Biesheuvel >> wrote: >>> On 28 February 2017 at 12:29, Matt Fleming wrote: On Tue, 28 Feb, at 01:20:25PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> >>> As I said before,

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 28/02/17 15:07, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > a big fat ia32 *allow a full fat.. -- bod

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 28/02/17 15:07, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > a big fat ia32 *allow a full fat.. -- bod

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Ard Biesheuvel > wrote: >> On 28 February 2017 at 12:29, Matt Fleming wrote: >>> On Tue, 28 Feb, at 01:20:25PM, Jan Kiszka

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Ard Biesheuvel > wrote: >> On 28 February 2017 at 12:29, Matt Fleming wrote: >>> On Tue, 28 Feb, at 01:20:25PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> As I said before, I'd be ok with it if we select it compile time, >>

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 28 February 2017 at 12:29, Matt Fleming wrote: >> On Tue, 28 Feb, at 01:20:25PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > As I said before, I'd be ok with it if we select it compile time, > i.e., no

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 28 February 2017 at 12:29, Matt Fleming wrote: >> On Tue, 28 Feb, at 01:20:25PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > As I said before, I'd be ok with it if we select it compile time, > i.e., no runtime logic that infers whether we are running on such

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 28 February 2017 at 12:29, Matt Fleming wrote: > On Tue, 28 Feb, at 01:20:25PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> >> From you POV, does this exclude upstream quirk support for already >> shipped devices? > > It would need to be an extremely small, well-contained change, that > had

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 28 February 2017 at 12:29, Matt Fleming wrote: > On Tue, 28 Feb, at 01:20:25PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> >> From you POV, does this exclude upstream quirk support for already >> shipped devices? > > It would need to be an extremely small, well-contained change, that > had no chance of disrupting

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On Tue, 28 Feb, at 01:20:25PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > From you POV, does this exclude upstream quirk support for already > shipped devices? It would need to be an extremely small, well-contained change, that had no chance of disrupting other users of the capsule interface and where I had a good

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On Tue, 28 Feb, at 01:20:25PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > From you POV, does this exclude upstream quirk support for already > shipped devices? It would need to be an extremely small, well-contained change, that had no chance of disrupting other users of the capsule interface and where I had a good

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 2017-02-28 13:12, Matt Fleming wrote: > On Fri, 17 Feb, at 10:24:41AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> >> I just can re-express my frustration that this essential step hasn't >> been started years ago by whoever designed the extension. Then I bet >> there would have been constructive feedback on the

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 2017-02-28 13:12, Matt Fleming wrote: > On Fri, 17 Feb, at 10:24:41AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> >> I just can re-express my frustration that this essential step hasn't >> been started years ago by whoever designed the extension. Then I bet >> there would have been constructive feedback on the

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On Fri, 17 Feb, at 10:24:41AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > I just can re-express my frustration that this essential step hasn't > been started years ago by whoever designed the extension. Then I bet > there would have been constructive feedback on the interface BEFORE its > ugliness spread to broader

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On Fri, 17 Feb, at 10:24:41AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > I just can re-express my frustration that this essential step hasn't > been started years ago by whoever designed the extension. Then I bet > there would have been constructive feedback on the interface BEFORE its > ugliness spread to broader

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 2017-02-19 17:33, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > > > On 19/02/17 13:33, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> I would not object strongly to having conditionally compiled code in >>> mainline that adds support for this, but bodging the default code path >>> like this for a Quark quirk is out of the question imo.

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 2017-02-19 17:33, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > > > On 19/02/17 13:33, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> I would not object strongly to having conditionally compiled code in >>> mainline that adds support for this, but bodging the default code path >>> like this for a Quark quirk is out of the question imo.

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 19/02/17 13:33, Jan Kiszka wrote: I would not object strongly to having conditionally compiled code in mainline that adds support for this, but bodging the default code path like this for a Quark quirk is out of the question imo. I'm open for any consensus that avoids bending mainline too

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 19/02/17 13:33, Jan Kiszka wrote: I would not object strongly to having conditionally compiled code in mainline that adds support for this, but bodging the default code path like this for a Quark quirk is out of the question imo. I'm open for any consensus that avoids bending mainline too

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

rnel >>>> Mailing >>>> List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de>; >>>> Kweh, >>>> Hock Leong <hock.leong.k...@intel.com>; Bryan O'Donoghue >>>> <pure.lo...@nexus-software.ie> >>

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

sday, February 16, 2017 3:00 AM >>>> To: Andy Shevchenko >>>> Cc: Matt Fleming ; Ard Biesheuvel >>>> ; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; Linux Kernel >>>> Mailing >>>> List ; Borislav Petkov ; >>>> Kweh, >>>> Hock L

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

slav Petkov <b...@alien8.de>; Kweh, >>> Hock Leong <hock.leong.k...@intel.com>; Bryan O'Donoghue >>> <pure.lo...@nexus-software.ie> >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark >>> images >>> >>> On 2

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

>>> Cc: Matt Fleming ; Ard Biesheuvel >>> ; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; Linux Kernel Mailing >>> List ; Borislav Petkov ; Kweh, >>> Hock Leong ; Bryan O'Donoghue >>> >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark >&g

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 17/02/17 10:14, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2017-02-17 10:51, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: >> On 17/02/17 08:23, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote: >>> And to have UEFI expand >>> it capsule support and take in signed binary would be a more secured way. >>> So, influencing UEFI community to have such support would

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 17/02/17 10:14, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2017-02-17 10:51, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: >> On 17/02/17 08:23, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote: >>> And to have UEFI expand >>> it capsule support and take in signed binary would be a more secured way. >>> So, influencing UEFI community to have such support would

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 2017-02-17 10:51, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > On 17/02/17 08:23, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote: >> And to have UEFI expand >> it capsule support and take in signed binary would be a more secured way. >> So, influencing UEFI community to have such support would be the right >> move throughout the

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 2017-02-17 10:51, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > On 17/02/17 08:23, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote: >> And to have UEFI expand >> it capsule support and take in signed binary would be a more secured way. >> So, influencing UEFI community to have such support would be the right >> move throughout the

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 17/02/17 08:23, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote: > And to have UEFI expand > it capsule support and take in signed binary would be a more secured way. > So, influencing UEFI community to have such support would be the right > move throughout the discussion. That is my summary. CSH stands for "Clanton

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 17/02/17 08:23, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote: > And to have UEFI expand > it capsule support and take in signed binary would be a more secured way. > So, influencing UEFI community to have such support would be the right > move throughout the discussion. That is my summary. CSH stands for "Clanton

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

vger.kernel.org; Linux Kernel >>>> Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Borislav Petkov >>>> <b...@alien8.de>; Kweh, Hock Leong <hock.leong.k...@intel.com>; Bryan >>>> O'Donoghue <pure.lo...@nexus-software.ie> >>>> Subject: Re:

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

Fleming ; Ard Biesheuvel >> ; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; Linux Kernel Mailing >> List ; Borislav Petkov >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark >> images >> >> >> >> On 16/02/17 03:00, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote: >>>

RE: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

ail.com> > Cc: Matt Fleming <m...@codeblueprint.co.uk>; Ard Biesheuvel > <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; Linux Kernel Mailing > List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule

RE: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

ing > List ; Borislav Petkov > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark > images > > > > On 16/02/17 03:00, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote: > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Jan Kiszka [mailto:jan.kis...@siemens.com]

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

<ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de>; Kweh, Hock Leong <hock.leong.k...@intel.com>; Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.lo...@nexus-software.ie> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance cap

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

; Kweh, Hock Leong ; Bryan O'Donoghue Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images On 2017-02-15 19:50, Jan Kiszka wrote: On 2017-02-15 19:46, Andy Shevchenko wrote: On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: See patch 2 for the background. Series

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

..@codeblueprint.co.uk>; Ard Biesheuvel >> <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; Linux Kernel Mailing >> List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de>; Kweh, >> Hock Leong <hock.leong.k...@intel.com>; Bryan O'Donoghue >&

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

el.org; Linux Kernel Mailing >> List ; Borislav Petkov ; Kweh, >> Hock Leong ; Bryan O'Donoghue >> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark >> images >> >> On 2017-02-15 19:50, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> On 2017-02-15 1

RE: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

o.org>; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; Linux Kernel Mailing > List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de>; Kweh, > Hock Leong <hock.leong.k...@intel.com>; Bryan O'Donoghue > <pure.lo...@nexus-software.ie> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance

RE: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

> Hock Leong ; Bryan O'Donoghue > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark > images > > On 2017-02-15 19:50, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > On 2017-02-15 19:46, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Jan Kiszka > wrote:

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 2017-02-15 19:50, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2017-02-15 19:46, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> See patch 2 for the background. >>> >>> Series has been tested on the Galileo Gen2, to exclude regressions, with >>> a

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 2017-02-15 19:50, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2017-02-15 19:46, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> See patch 2 for the background. >>> >>> Series has been tested on the Galileo Gen2, to exclude regressions, with >>> a firmware.cap without security

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 2017-02-15 19:46, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> See patch 2 for the background. >> >> Series has been tested on the Galileo Gen2, to exclude regressions, with >> a firmware.cap without security header and the SIMATIC

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 2017-02-15 19:46, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> See patch 2 for the background. >> >> Series has been tested on the Galileo Gen2, to exclude regressions, with >> a firmware.cap without security header and the SIMATIC IOT2040 which >> requires

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 2017-02-15 19:17, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 15 February 2017 at 18:14, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> See patch 2 for the background. >> >> Series has been tested on the Galileo Gen2, to exclude regressions, with >> a firmware.cap without security header and the SIMATIC IOT2040

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 2017-02-15 19:17, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 15 February 2017 at 18:14, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> See patch 2 for the background. >> >> Series has been tested on the Galileo Gen2, to exclude regressions, with >> a firmware.cap without security header and the SIMATIC IOT2040 which >> requires the

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > See patch 2 for the background. > > Series has been tested on the Galileo Gen2, to exclude regressions, with > a firmware.cap without security header and the SIMATIC IOT2040 which > requires the header because of its

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > See patch 2 for the background. > > Series has been tested on the Galileo Gen2, to exclude regressions, with > a firmware.cap without security header and the SIMATIC IOT2040 which > requires the header because of its mandatory secure boot.

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > See patch 2 for the background. > > Series has been tested on the Galileo Gen2, to exclude regressions, with > a firmware.cap without security header and the SIMATIC IOT2040 which > requires the header because of its

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > See patch 2 for the background. > > Series has been tested on the Galileo Gen2, to exclude regressions, with > a firmware.cap without security header and the SIMATIC IOT2040 which > requires the header because of its mandatory secure boot. > >

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 15 February 2017 at 18:14, Jan Kiszka wrote: > See patch 2 for the background. > > Series has been tested on the Galileo Gen2, to exclude regressions, with > a firmware.cap without security header and the SIMATIC IOT2040 which > requires the header because of its

Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images

On 15 February 2017 at 18:14, Jan Kiszka wrote: > See patch 2 for the background. > > Series has been tested on the Galileo Gen2, to exclude regressions, with > a firmware.cap without security header and the SIMATIC IOT2040 which > requires the header because of its mandatory secure boot. >