Re: [PATCH 0/4] scheduler-based cpu frequency scaling

2015-05-05 Thread Mike Turquette
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, May 04, 2015 03:10:37 PM Michael Turquette wrote: >> This series implements an event-driven cpufreq governor that scales cpu >> frequency as a function of cfs runqueue utilization. The intent of this RFC >> is >> to get some

Re: [PATCH 0/4] scheduler-based cpu frequency scaling

2015-05-05 Thread Mike Turquette
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net wrote: On Monday, May 04, 2015 03:10:37 PM Michael Turquette wrote: This series implements an event-driven cpufreq governor that scales cpu frequency as a function of cfs runqueue utilization. The intent of this RFC is to

Re: [PATCH 0/4] scheduler-based cpu frequency scaling

2015-05-04 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, May 04, 2015 03:10:37 PM Michael Turquette wrote: > This series implements an event-driven cpufreq governor that scales cpu > frequency as a function of cfs runqueue utilization. The intent of this RFC is > to get some discussion going about how the scheduler can become the policy >

Re: [PATCH 0/4] scheduler-based cpu frequency scaling

2015-05-04 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, May 04, 2015 03:10:37 PM Michael Turquette wrote: This series implements an event-driven cpufreq governor that scales cpu frequency as a function of cfs runqueue utilization. The intent of this RFC is to get some discussion going about how the scheduler can become the policy engine