On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:47:58PM -0700, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> On 08/13/2012 11:22 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 07:35:30PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:12:13PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >>> This patchset promotes
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:47:58PM -0700, Nitin Gupta wrote:
On 08/13/2012 11:22 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 07:35:30PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:12:13PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from
On 08/13/2012 11:22 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 07:35:30PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:12:13PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
>>> This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
>>> Both are very clean and zram is used by many
On 08/13/2012 11:22 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 07:35:30PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:12:13PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
Both are very clean and zram is used by many embedded
> > On a second thought, I think zsmalloc should stay in drivers/block/zram
> > since zram is now the only user of zsmalloc since zcache and ramster are
> > moving to another allocator.
>
> The removal of zsmalloc from zcache has not been agreed upon
> yet.
>
> Dan _suggested_ removing zsmalloc
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:39:25PM -0500, Seth Jennings wrote:
> On 08/14/2012 12:36 AM, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> > On 08/13/2012 07:35 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:12:13PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >>> This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
> >>> Both
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:39:25PM -0500, Seth Jennings wrote:
On 08/14/2012 12:36 AM, Nitin Gupta wrote:
On 08/13/2012 07:35 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:12:13PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
Both are very clean
On a second thought, I think zsmalloc should stay in drivers/block/zram
since zram is now the only user of zsmalloc since zcache and ramster are
moving to another allocator.
The removal of zsmalloc from zcache has not been agreed upon
yet.
Dan _suggested_ removing zsmalloc as the
On 08/14/2012 12:36 AM, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> On 08/13/2012 07:35 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:12:13PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
>>> This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
>>> Both are very clean and zram is used by many embedded product
>>> for a long
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 03:22:47PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 07:35:30PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:12:13PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
> > > Both are very clean and
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 07:35:30PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:12:13PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
> > Both are very clean and zram is used by many embedded product
> > for a long time.
> >
> > [1-3]
Hi Nitin,
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:36:47PM -0700, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> On 08/13/2012 07:35 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:12:13PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >> This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
> >> Both are very clean and zram is used by many
Hi Nitin,
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:36:47PM -0700, Nitin Gupta wrote:
On 08/13/2012 07:35 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:12:13PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
Both are very clean and zram is used by many embedded
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 07:35:30PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:12:13PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
Both are very clean and zram is used by many embedded product
for a long time.
[1-3] are patches
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 03:22:47PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 07:35:30PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:12:13PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
Both are very clean and zram is used
On 08/14/2012 12:36 AM, Nitin Gupta wrote:
On 08/13/2012 07:35 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:12:13PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
Both are very clean and zram is used by many embedded product
for a long time.
[1-3]
On 08/13/2012 07:35 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:12:13PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
>> Both are very clean and zram is used by many embedded product
>> for a long time.
>>
>> [1-3] are patches not merged into
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:12:13PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
> Both are very clean and zram is used by many embedded product
> for a long time.
>
> [1-3] are patches not merged into linux-next yet but needed
> it as base for [4-5] which
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:12:13PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
Both are very clean and zram is used by many embedded product
for a long time.
[1-3] are patches not merged into linux-next yet but needed
it as base for [4-5] which promotes
On 08/13/2012 07:35 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:12:13PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
Both are very clean and zram is used by many embedded product
for a long time.
[1-3] are patches not merged into linux-next yet
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:35:37AM -0700, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> On 08/07/2012 11:12 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
> > Both are very clean and zram is used by many embedded product
> > for a long time.
> >
> > [1-3] are patches not merged into
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:35:37AM -0700, Nitin Gupta wrote:
On 08/07/2012 11:12 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
Both are very clean and zram is used by many embedded product
for a long time.
[1-3] are patches not merged into linux-next yet but
On 08/07/2012 11:12 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
> Both are very clean and zram is used by many embedded product
> for a long time.
>
> [1-3] are patches not merged into linux-next yet but needed
> it as base for [4-5] which promotes zsmalloc.
>
On 08/07/2012 11:12 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
Both are very clean and zram is used by many embedded product
for a long time.
[1-3] are patches not merged into linux-next yet but needed
it as base for [4-5] which promotes zsmalloc.
Greg, if
24 matches
Mail list logo
