Re: [PATCH 00/11] splice cleanups

2016-09-26 Thread Al Viro
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:37:05AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > This contains assorted cleanups in the splice area: > > - add helpers for pipe buf ops instead of directly calling them > > - page cache buf doesn't seem to need confirming (since ages) > > - generic_file_splice_read() and gene

Re: [PATCH 00/11] splice cleanups

2016-09-16 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:37:05AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > This contains assorted cleanups in the splice area: > > - add helpers for pipe buf ops instead of directly calling them > > - page cache buf doesn't seem to need confirming (since ages) > > - generic_file_splice_read() and gene

Re: [PATCH 00/11] splice cleanups

2016-09-14 Thread Miklos Szeredi
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Cedric Blancher wrote: > Is there any shell which uses pipe splicing? for i in /usr/bin/*; do if file $i | grep -q ELF; then if nm -D $i | grep -q splice; then echo $i; fi; fi; done For me it does not yield anything by which you could easily try out splicing. A

Re: [PATCH 00/11] splice cleanups

2016-09-14 Thread Cedric Blancher
Is there any shell which uses pipe splicing? Ced On 14 September 2016 at 10:37, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > This contains assorted cleanups in the splice area: > > - add helpers for pipe buf ops instead of directly calling them > > - page cache buf doesn't seem to need confirming (since ages) > >