On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 05:21:00PM +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> If you have a simple reproducer for the bugs I am happy to help you test
> it (I can also apply arm64 DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS patches and test that
> new code path if that's the final direction we are taking).
The easiest way
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 05:21:00PM +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> If you have a simple reproducer for the bugs I am happy to help you test
> it (I can also apply arm64 DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS patches and test that
> new code path if that's the final direction we are taking).
The easiest way
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 09:47:52AM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 04:34:08PM +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > The question is whether we really need to dynamically patch the kernel
> > with ftrace to achieve what that patch does.
> >
> > Furthermore, it would also be good
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 09:47:52AM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 04:34:08PM +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > The question is whether we really need to dynamically patch the kernel
> > with ftrace to achieve what that patch does.
> >
> > Furthermore, it would also be good
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 04:34:08PM +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> The question is whether we really need to dynamically patch the kernel
> with ftrace to achieve what that patch does.
>
> Furthermore, it would also be good to report what bugs we are actually
> fixing, from what you are writing
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 04:34:08PM +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> The question is whether we really need to dynamically patch the kernel
> with ftrace to achieve what that patch does.
>
> Furthermore, it would also be good to report what bugs we are actually
> fixing, from what you are writing
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 10:18:47AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 12:31:45PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > [+cc arm64 folks, LKML: This conversation is about this patch:
> >
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20180918235848.26694-3-keith.bu...@intel.com
> >
> >
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 10:18:47AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 12:31:45PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > [+cc arm64 folks, LKML: This conversation is about this patch:
> >
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20180918235848.26694-3-keith.bu...@intel.com
> >
> >
Hi Bjorn,
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 12:31:45PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc arm64 folks, LKML: This conversation is about this patch:
>
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20180918235848.26694-3-keith.bu...@intel.com
>
> which fixes some PCIe AER error injection bugs, but also makes
Hi Bjorn,
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 12:31:45PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc arm64 folks, LKML: This conversation is about this patch:
>
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20180918235848.26694-3-keith.bu...@intel.com
>
> which fixes some PCIe AER error injection bugs, but also makes
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 10:18:47AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 12:31:45PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > [+cc arm64 folks, LKML: This conversation is about this patch:
> >
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20180918235848.26694-3-keith.bu...@intel.com
> >
> >
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 10:18:47AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 12:31:45PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > [+cc arm64 folks, LKML: This conversation is about this patch:
> >
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20180918235848.26694-3-keith.bu...@intel.com
> >
> >
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 12:31:45PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc arm64 folks, LKML: This conversation is about this patch:
>
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20180918235848.26694-3-keith.bu...@intel.com
>
> which fixes some PCIe AER error injection bugs, but also makes the error
>
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 12:31:45PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc arm64 folks, LKML: This conversation is about this patch:
>
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20180918235848.26694-3-keith.bu...@intel.com
>
> which fixes some PCIe AER error injection bugs, but also makes the error
>
[+cc arm64 folks, LKML: This conversation is about this patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20180918235848.26694-3-keith.bu...@intel.com
which fixes some PCIe AER error injection bugs, but also makes the error
injector dependent on DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS, which not all arches
support.
[+cc arm64 folks, LKML: This conversation is about this patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20180918235848.26694-3-keith.bu...@intel.com
which fixes some PCIe AER error injection bugs, but also makes the error
injector dependent on DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS, which not all arches
support.
16 matches
Mail list logo