On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 10:03:26AM +0100, Ulf Magnusson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 02:50:39PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > 2018-02-22 6:39 GMT+09:00 Ulf Magnusson :
> > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 09:57:03PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > >> 2018-02-21 19:52 GMT+09:00 Arnd Bergmann :
>
On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 02:50:39PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2018-02-22 6:39 GMT+09:00 Ulf Magnusson :
> > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 09:57:03PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >> 2018-02-21 19:52 GMT+09:00 Arnd Bergmann :
> >> > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:20 AM, Masahiro Yamada
> >> > wrote:
>
2018-02-22 6:39 GMT+09:00 Ulf Magnusson :
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 09:57:03PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> 2018-02-21 19:52 GMT+09:00 Arnd Bergmann :
>> > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:20 AM, Masahiro Yamada
>> > wrote:
>> >> 2018-02-21 18:56 GMT+09:00 Arnd Bergmann :
>> >>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018
Masahiro Yamada writes:
>
>
> (Case 3)
> Compiler flag -foo is sensitive to endian-ness.
>
>
> config CC_NEEDS_BIG_ENDIAN
> def_bool $(cc-option -mbig-endian) && CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
>
> config CC_NEEDS_LITTLE_ENDIAN
> def_bool $(cc-option -mlittle-endian) && CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN
>
> c
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 09:57:03PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2018-02-21 19:52 GMT+09:00 Arnd Bergmann :
> > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:20 AM, Masahiro Yamada
> > wrote:
> >> 2018-02-21 18:56 GMT+09:00 Arnd Bergmann :
> >>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:38 AM, Masahiro Yamada
> >>> wrote:
>
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 1:57 PM, Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
> 2018-02-21 19:52 GMT+09:00 Arnd Bergmann :
>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:20 AM, Masahiro Yamada
>> wrote:
>>> 2018-02-21 18:56 GMT+09:00 Arnd Bergmann :
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:38 AM, Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
> 2018-02-20 0:
2018-02-21 19:52 GMT+09:00 Arnd Bergmann :
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:20 AM, Masahiro Yamada
> wrote:
>> 2018-02-21 18:56 GMT+09:00 Arnd Bergmann :
>>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:38 AM, Masahiro Yamada
>>> wrote:
2018-02-20 0:18 GMT+09:00 Ulf Magnusson :
>>
>> Let me clarify my concern.
>>
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:20 AM, Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
> 2018-02-21 18:56 GMT+09:00 Arnd Bergmann :
>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:38 AM, Masahiro Yamada
>> wrote:
>>> 2018-02-20 0:18 GMT+09:00 Ulf Magnusson :
>
> Let me clarify my concern.
>
> When we test the compiler flag, is there a case
> wh
2018-02-21 18:56 GMT+09:00 Arnd Bergmann :
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:38 AM, Masahiro Yamada
> wrote:
>> 2018-02-20 0:18 GMT+09:00 Ulf Magnusson :
>>
I'm not happy that we in one context can reference CONFIG variables
directly, but inside the $(call ...) and $(shell ...) needs the
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:38 AM, Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
> 2018-02-20 0:18 GMT+09:00 Ulf Magnusson :
>
>>>
>>> I'm not happy that we in one context can reference CONFIG variables
>>> directly, but inside the $(call ...) and $(shell ...) needs the $ prefix.
>>> But I could not come up with something
2018-02-20 0:18 GMT+09:00 Ulf Magnusson :
>>
>> I'm not happy that we in one context can reference CONFIG variables
>> directly, but inside the $(call ...) and $(shell ...) needs the $ prefix.
>> But I could not come up with something un-ambigious where this could be
>> avoided.
>
> I think we sh
Hello,
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 11:13 PM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Masahiro.
>
> On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 03:38:28AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> I brushed up the implementation in this version.
>>
>> In the previous RFC, CC_HAS_ was described by using 'option shell=',
>> like this:
>>
>> confi
Hi Masahiro.
On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 03:38:28AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> I brushed up the implementation in this version.
>
> In the previous RFC, CC_HAS_ was described by using 'option shell=',
> like this:
>
> config CC_HAS_STACKPROTECTOR
> bool
> option shell="$CC -Werr
13 matches
Mail list logo