On 01/10, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 09-01-17, 15:36, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> > It would be better to have _find_opp_table()
> > return the pointer with the reference already taken so that we
> > don't have to update callers with reference grabbing calls.
> > Typically if a function returns a
On 01/10, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 09-01-17, 15:36, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> > It would be better to have _find_opp_table()
> > return the pointer with the reference already taken so that we
> > don't have to update callers with reference grabbing calls.
> > Typically if a function returns a
On 09-01-17, 15:36, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 12/07, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > @@ -894,8 +895,36 @@ static void _kfree_device_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
> > kfree_rcu(opp_table, rcu_head);
> > }
> >
> > -static void _free_opp_table(struct opp_table *opp_table)
> > +void
On 09-01-17, 15:36, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 12/07, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > @@ -894,8 +895,36 @@ static void _kfree_device_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
> > kfree_rcu(opp_table, rcu_head);
> > }
> >
> > -static void _free_opp_table(struct opp_table *opp_table)
> > +void
On 12/07, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> @@ -894,8 +895,36 @@ static void _kfree_device_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
> kfree_rcu(opp_table, rcu_head);
> }
>
> -static void _free_opp_table(struct opp_table *opp_table)
> +void _get_opp_table_kref(struct opp_table *opp_table)
> {
> +
On 12/07, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> @@ -894,8 +895,36 @@ static void _kfree_device_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
> kfree_rcu(opp_table, rcu_head);
> }
>
> -static void _free_opp_table(struct opp_table *opp_table)
> +void _get_opp_table_kref(struct opp_table *opp_table)
> {
> +
6 matches
Mail list logo
