Paolo Bonzini writes:
> Il 27/02/2013 12:21, Rusty Russell ha scritto:
>> Baseline (before add_sgs):
>> 2.84-3.04(2.927292)user
>>
>> After add_sgs:
>> 2.97-3.15(3.053750)user
>>
>> After simplifying add_buf a little:
>>
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes:
Il 27/02/2013 12:21, Rusty Russell ha scritto:
Baseline (before add_sgs):
2.84-3.04(2.927292)user
After add_sgs:
2.97-3.15(3.053750)user
After simplifying add_buf a little:
Il 27/02/2013 12:21, Rusty Russell ha scritto:
>>> >> Baseline (before add_sgs):
>>> >> 2.84-3.04(2.927292)user
>>> >>
>>> >> After add_sgs:
>>> >> 2.97-3.15(3.053750)user
>>> >>
>>> >> After simplifying add_buf a little:
>>> >>
Il 27/02/2013 12:21, Rusty Russell ha scritto:
Baseline (before add_sgs):
2.84-3.04(2.927292)user
After add_sgs:
2.97-3.15(3.053750)user
After simplifying add_buf a little:
2.95-3.21(3.081458)user
After inlining
"Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 05:58:37PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Paolo Bonzini writes:
>> > Il 24/02/2013 23:12, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>> >> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:26:20PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> >>> virtio_scsi can really use this, to avoid
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 05:58:37PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes:
Il 24/02/2013 23:12, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:26:20PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
virtio_scsi can really use
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 05:58:37PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini writes:
> > Il 24/02/2013 23:12, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> >> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:26:20PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> >>> virtio_scsi can really use this, to avoid the current hack of copying
> >>> the
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> Il 24/02/2013 23:12, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:26:20PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>> virtio_scsi can really use this, to avoid the current hack of copying
>>> the whole sg array. Some other things get slightly neater, too.
>>>
>>>
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 03:44:26PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:26:20PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> >> virtio_scsi can really use this, to avoid the current hack of copying
> >> the whole sg array. Some other things get slightly
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 03:44:26PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:26:20PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
virtio_scsi can really use this, to avoid the current hack of copying
the whole sg array. Some other things get slightly
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes:
Il 24/02/2013 23:12, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:26:20PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
virtio_scsi can really use this, to avoid the current hack of copying
the whole sg array. Some other things get slightly neater, too.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 05:58:37PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes:
Il 24/02/2013 23:12, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:26:20PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
virtio_scsi can really use this, to avoid the current hack of copying
Il 24/02/2013 23:12, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:26:20PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> virtio_scsi can really use this, to avoid the current hack of copying
>> the whole sg array. Some other things get slightly neater, too.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell
>
>
"Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:26:20PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> virtio_scsi can really use this, to avoid the current hack of copying
>> the whole sg array. Some other things get slightly neater, too.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell
>
> Hmm, this makes
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:26:20PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
virtio_scsi can really use this, to avoid the current hack of copying
the whole sg array. Some other things get slightly neater, too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au
Il 24/02/2013 23:12, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:26:20PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
virtio_scsi can really use this, to avoid the current hack of copying
the whole sg array. Some other things get slightly neater, too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:26:20PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> virtio_scsi can really use this, to avoid the current hack of copying
> the whole sg array. Some other things get slightly neater, too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell
Hmm, this makes add_buf a bit slower. virtio_test results
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:26:20PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
virtio_scsi can really use this, to avoid the current hack of copying
the whole sg array. Some other things get slightly neater, too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au
Hmm, this makes add_buf a bit slower.
On 02/19/2013 03:56 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> virtio_scsi can really use this, to avoid the current hack of copying
> the whole sg array. Some other things get slightly neater, too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell
This simpler API makes more sense to me.
Reviewed-by: Asias He
> ---
>
On 02/19/2013 03:56 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
virtio_scsi can really use this, to avoid the current hack of copying
the whole sg array. Some other things get slightly neater, too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au
This simpler API makes more sense to me.
Reviewed-by: Asias
On 02/19/2013 03:56 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> virtio_scsi can really use this, to avoid the current hack of copying
> the whole sg array. Some other things get slightly neater, too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell
I like this simple implementation.
Reviewed-by: Wanlong Gao
> ---
>
On 02/19/2013 03:56 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
virtio_scsi can really use this, to avoid the current hack of copying
the whole sg array. Some other things get slightly neater, too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au
I like this simple implementation.
Reviewed-by: Wanlong Gao
22 matches
Mail list logo
