Re: [PATCH 02/21] fs: remove inline marking of EXPORT_SYMBOL functions
On 09.05.2013 12:07, Al Viro wrote: On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 11:58:24AM +0400, Denis Efremov wrote: EXPORT_SYMBOL and inline directives are contradictory to each other. The patch fixes this inconsistency. What makes them contradictory, in your opinion? With references to relevant parts of C99, please. Looks like the introductory message was rejected by mailing list. Will try to do something with this. You can find it here: http://linuxtesting.org/pipermail/ldv-project/2013-May/000101.html Patchset is based on previous fixes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 02/21] fs: remove inline marking of EXPORT_SYMBOL functions
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 11:58:24AM +0400, Denis Efremov wrote: > EXPORT_SYMBOL and inline directives are contradictory to each other. > The patch fixes this inconsistency. What makes them contradictory, in your opinion? With references to relevant parts of C99, please. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 02/21] fs: remove inline marking of EXPORT_SYMBOL functions
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 11:58:24AM +0400, Denis Efremov wrote: EXPORT_SYMBOL and inline directives are contradictory to each other. The patch fixes this inconsistency. What makes them contradictory, in your opinion? With references to relevant parts of C99, please. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 02/21] fs: remove inline marking of EXPORT_SYMBOL functions
On 09.05.2013 12:07, Al Viro wrote: On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 11:58:24AM +0400, Denis Efremov wrote: EXPORT_SYMBOL and inline directives are contradictory to each other. The patch fixes this inconsistency. What makes them contradictory, in your opinion? With references to relevant parts of C99, please. Looks like the introductory message was rejected by mailing list. Will try to do something with this. You can find it here: http://linuxtesting.org/pipermail/ldv-project/2013-May/000101.html Patchset is based on previous fixes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
