Re: [PATCH 08/15] Use spufs_coredump_num_notes everywhere, and don't NULL terminate
On Wednesday 12 September 2007, Michael Ellerman wrote: > The spufs_coredump_read array is NULL terminated, and we also store the size. > We only need one or the other, and storing the size should save a teensy bit > of memory vs NULL terminating, so do that. Given that we have another array in there with almost the same contents and that is NULL terminated, I'd vote for doing it the other way and also use NULL-termination instead of the count here. Arnd <>< - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 08/15] Use spufs_coredump_num_notes everywhere, and don't NULL terminate
On Wednesday 12 September 2007, Michael Ellerman wrote: The spufs_coredump_read array is NULL terminated, and we also store the size. We only need one or the other, and storing the size should save a teensy bit of memory vs NULL terminating, so do that. Given that we have another array in there with almost the same contents and that is NULL terminated, I'd vote for doing it the other way and also use NULL-termination instead of the count here. Arnd - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
