On 2017/8/9 17:27, sunqiuyang wrote:
> From: Qiuyang Sun
>
> Currently, the two flags F2FS_GET_BLOCK_[READ|DIO] are totally equivalent
> and can be used interchangably in all scenarios they are involved in.
> Neither of the flags is referenced in f2fs_map_blocks(), making them both
> the defaul
On 2017/8/8 19:41, Sun Qiuyang wrote:
>
>
>> On 2017/8/8 18:27, sunqiuyang wrote:
>>> From: Qiuyang Sun
>>>
>>> Currently, the two flags F2FS_GET_BLOCK_[READ|DIO] are totally equivalent
>>> and can be used interchangably in all scenarios they are involved in. This
>>> patch deletes F2FS_GET_BLOC
On 2017/8/8 18:27, sunqiuyang wrote:
From: Qiuyang Sun
Currently, the two flags F2FS_GET_BLOCK_[READ|DIO] are totally equivalent
and can be used interchangably in all scenarios they are involved in. This
patch deletes F2FS_GET_BLOCK_READ and uses F2FS_GET_BLOCK_DIO instead.
Seems weird fro
On 2017/8/8 18:27, sunqiuyang wrote:
> From: Qiuyang Sun
>
> Currently, the two flags F2FS_GET_BLOCK_[READ|DIO] are totally equivalent
> and can be used interchangably in all scenarios they are involved in. This
> patch deletes F2FS_GET_BLOCK_READ and uses F2FS_GET_BLOCK_DIO instead.
Seems weird
4 matches
Mail list logo