Re: [PATCH 1/2] [media] exynos-gsc: Fix unbalanced pm_runtime_enable() error

2017-01-19 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Marek,

On 01/19/2017 11:12 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi Javier,
> 
> On 2017-01-18 01:30, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> Commit a006c04e6218 ("[media] exynos-gsc: Fixup clock management at
>> ->remove()") changed the driver's .remove function logic to fist do
>> a pm_runtime_get_sync() to make sure the device is powered before
>> attempting to gate the gsc clock.
>>
>> But the commit also removed a pm_runtime_disable() call that leads
>> to an unbalanced pm_runtime_enable() error if the driver is removed
>> and re-probed:
>>
>> exynos-gsc 13e0.video-scaler: Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable!
>> exynos-gsc 13e1.video-scaler: Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable!
>>
>> Fixes: a006c04e6218 ("[media] exynos-gsc: Fixup clock management at 
>> ->remove()")
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas 
> 
> I must have mixed something during the rebase of the Ulf's patch, because
> the original one kept pm_runtime_disable in the right place:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-January/317678.html
> 
> I'm really sorry.
> 

Ah, I see. No worries.

> Acked-by: Marek Szyprowski 
> 

Thanks a lot for your review.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America


Re: [PATCH 1/2] [media] exynos-gsc: Fix unbalanced pm_runtime_enable() error

2017-01-19 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Marek,

On 01/19/2017 11:12 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi Javier,
> 
> On 2017-01-18 01:30, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> Commit a006c04e6218 ("[media] exynos-gsc: Fixup clock management at
>> ->remove()") changed the driver's .remove function logic to fist do
>> a pm_runtime_get_sync() to make sure the device is powered before
>> attempting to gate the gsc clock.
>>
>> But the commit also removed a pm_runtime_disable() call that leads
>> to an unbalanced pm_runtime_enable() error if the driver is removed
>> and re-probed:
>>
>> exynos-gsc 13e0.video-scaler: Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable!
>> exynos-gsc 13e1.video-scaler: Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable!
>>
>> Fixes: a006c04e6218 ("[media] exynos-gsc: Fixup clock management at 
>> ->remove()")
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas 
> 
> I must have mixed something during the rebase of the Ulf's patch, because
> the original one kept pm_runtime_disable in the right place:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-January/317678.html
> 
> I'm really sorry.
> 

Ah, I see. No worries.

> Acked-by: Marek Szyprowski 
> 

Thanks a lot for your review.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America


Re: [PATCH 1/2] [media] exynos-gsc: Fix unbalanced pm_runtime_enable() error

2017-01-19 Thread Marek Szyprowski

Hi Javier,

On 2017-01-18 01:30, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:

Commit a006c04e6218 ("[media] exynos-gsc: Fixup clock management at
->remove()") changed the driver's .remove function logic to fist do
a pm_runtime_get_sync() to make sure the device is powered before
attempting to gate the gsc clock.

But the commit also removed a pm_runtime_disable() call that leads
to an unbalanced pm_runtime_enable() error if the driver is removed
and re-probed:

exynos-gsc 13e0.video-scaler: Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable!
exynos-gsc 13e1.video-scaler: Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable!

Fixes: a006c04e6218 ("[media] exynos-gsc: Fixup clock management at ->remove()")
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas 


I must have mixed something during the rebase of the Ulf's patch, because
the original one kept pm_runtime_disable in the right place:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-January/317678.html

I'm really sorry.

Acked-by: Marek Szyprowski 


---

  drivers/media/platform/exynos-gsc/gsc-core.c | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/exynos-gsc/gsc-core.c 
b/drivers/media/platform/exynos-gsc/gsc-core.c
index cbf75b6194b4..83272f10722d 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/exynos-gsc/gsc-core.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/exynos-gsc/gsc-core.c
@@ -1118,6 +1118,7 @@ static int gsc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
clk_disable_unprepare(gsc->clock[i]);
  
  	pm_runtime_put_noidle(>dev);

+   pm_runtime_disable(>dev);
  
  	dev_dbg(>dev, "%s driver unloaded\n", pdev->name);

return 0;


Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R Institute Poland



Re: [PATCH 1/2] [media] exynos-gsc: Fix unbalanced pm_runtime_enable() error

2017-01-19 Thread Marek Szyprowski

Hi Javier,

On 2017-01-18 01:30, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:

Commit a006c04e6218 ("[media] exynos-gsc: Fixup clock management at
->remove()") changed the driver's .remove function logic to fist do
a pm_runtime_get_sync() to make sure the device is powered before
attempting to gate the gsc clock.

But the commit also removed a pm_runtime_disable() call that leads
to an unbalanced pm_runtime_enable() error if the driver is removed
and re-probed:

exynos-gsc 13e0.video-scaler: Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable!
exynos-gsc 13e1.video-scaler: Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable!

Fixes: a006c04e6218 ("[media] exynos-gsc: Fixup clock management at ->remove()")
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas 


I must have mixed something during the rebase of the Ulf's patch, because
the original one kept pm_runtime_disable in the right place:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-January/317678.html

I'm really sorry.

Acked-by: Marek Szyprowski 


---

  drivers/media/platform/exynos-gsc/gsc-core.c | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/exynos-gsc/gsc-core.c 
b/drivers/media/platform/exynos-gsc/gsc-core.c
index cbf75b6194b4..83272f10722d 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/exynos-gsc/gsc-core.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/exynos-gsc/gsc-core.c
@@ -1118,6 +1118,7 @@ static int gsc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
clk_disable_unprepare(gsc->clock[i]);
  
  	pm_runtime_put_noidle(>dev);

+   pm_runtime_disable(>dev);
  
  	dev_dbg(>dev, "%s driver unloaded\n", pdev->name);

return 0;


Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R Institute Poland