Hi David,
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.10-rc3 next-20170113]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Hi David,
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.10-rc3 next-20170113]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
kbuild test robot wrote:
>fs/afs/cmservice.c: In function 'afs_deliver_cb_init_call_back_state3':
> >> fs/afs/cmservice.c:365:34: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to
> >> incomplete type 'struct uuid_v1'
> call->request = kmalloc(sizeof(struct uuid_v1),
kbuild test robot wrote:
>fs/afs/cmservice.c: In function 'afs_deliver_cb_init_call_back_state3':
> >> fs/afs/cmservice.c:365:34: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to
> >> incomplete type 'struct uuid_v1'
> call->request = kmalloc(sizeof(struct uuid_v1), GFP_KERNEL);
>
Hi David,
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.10-rc3 next-20170113]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Hi David,
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.10-rc3 next-20170113]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Yes, looks good to me.
Can I put that down as a Reviewed-by?
David
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Yes, looks good to me.
Can I put that down as a Reviewed-by?
David
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 5:14 PM, David Howells wrote:
>> > reply.ia.uuid[3] = htonl((s8) afs_uuid.clock_seq_hi_and_reserved);
>> > reply.ia.uuid[4] = htonl((s8) afs_uuid.clock_seq_low);
>> > for (loop = 0; loop < 6; loop++)
>>
>> Shouldn't this be
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 5:14 PM, David Howells wrote:
>> > reply.ia.uuid[3] = htonl((s8) afs_uuid.clock_seq_hi_and_reserved);
>> > reply.ia.uuid[4] = htonl((s8) afs_uuid.clock_seq_low);
>> > for (loop = 0; loop < 6; loop++)
>>
>> Shouldn't this be ntohs() instead of
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > - reply.ia.uuid[0] = htonl(afs_uuid.time_low);
> > - reply.ia.uuid[1] = htonl(afs_uuid.time_mid);
> > - reply.ia.uuid[2] = htonl(afs_uuid.time_hi_and_version);
> > + reply.ia.uuid[0] = afs_uuid.time_low;
> > + reply.ia.uuid[1]
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > - reply.ia.uuid[0] = htonl(afs_uuid.time_low);
> > - reply.ia.uuid[1] = htonl(afs_uuid.time_mid);
> > - reply.ia.uuid[2] = htonl(afs_uuid.time_hi_and_version);
> > + reply.ia.uuid[0] = afs_uuid.time_low;
> > + reply.ia.uuid[1] =
On Thursday, January 12, 2017 2:12:56 PM CET David Howells wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > Looks good to me, but I wonder if this part:
> >
> > r = call->request;
> > - r->time_low = ntohl(b[0]);
> > -
On Thursday, January 12, 2017 2:12:56 PM CET David Howells wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > Looks good to me, but I wonder if this part:
> >
> > r = call->request;
> > - r->time_low = ntohl(b[0]);
> > - r->time_mid
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Looks good to me, but I wonder if this part:
>
> r = call->request;
> - r->time_low = ntohl(b[0]);
> - r->time_mid = ntohl(b[1]);
> - r->time_hi_and_version
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Looks good to me, but I wonder if this part:
>
> r = call->request;
> - r->time_low = ntohl(b[0]);
> - r->time_mid = ntohl(b[1]);
> - r->time_hi_and_version =
On Thursday, January 12, 2017 11:56:34 AM CET David Howells wrote:
> Move the afs_uuid struct to linux/uuid.h and rename it to uuid_v1.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells
>
Looks good to me, but I wonder if this part:
r = call->request;
-
On Thursday, January 12, 2017 11:56:34 AM CET David Howells wrote:
> Move the afs_uuid struct to linux/uuid.h and rename it to uuid_v1.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells
>
Looks good to me, but I wonder if this part:
r = call->request;
- r->time_low
18 matches
Mail list logo