On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 10:39:25PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 9:04 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:47:06PM +, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > > lib/rbtree.c has ensured that there is not possible to
> > > inadvertently cause (temporary) loops in the
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 9:04 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:47:06PM +, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > lib/rbtree.c has ensured that there is not possible to
> > inadvertently cause (temporary) loops in the tree structure
> > as seen in program order of the modifier. But
- On May 15, 2020, at 8:47 AM, Lai Jiangshan la...@linux.alibaba.com wrote:
[...]
> So the serarch should stop when diving down up to
> 2*BITS_PER_LONG depth.
serarch -> search
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:47:06PM +, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> lib/rbtree.c has ensured that there is not possible to
> inadvertently cause (temporary) loops in the tree structure
> as seen in program order of the modifier. But loop is still
> possible to be seen in searcher due to CPU's
4 matches
Mail list logo