Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Represent channel layout in structures

[Stephen Boyd]

On 08/31/2015 09:55 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon 31 Aug 18:39 PDT 2015, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
>> The rx and tx channel info are laid out in memory next to each
>> other, and there are two types of channel info structures, byte
>> based and word based. We have 4 pointers to these info
>> structures, when we really only need two to point to the
>> different types of structures. Encapsulate the byte based and word
>> based tx/rx structures in a "full channel" structure that
>> describes the layout of memory and reduces the number of pointers
>> in the smd channel structure by two.
>>
> Saving the extra pointer doesn't feel like worth the change, but
> representing the pair of info structs as one sounds like a reasonable
> cleanup.

Agreed.

>
> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson 
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd 
>> ---
>>  drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c | 61 
>> +++---
>>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c
>> index edd9d9a37238..c16547b85e05 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c
>> @@ -65,7 +65,9 @@
>>   */
>>  
>>  struct smd_channel_info;
>> +struct smd_full_channel_info;
> I would have called this "smd_channel_info_pair"...

Sure I'll make the change and add your Reviewed-by.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Represent channel layout in structures

[Stephen Boyd]

On 08/31/2015 09:55 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon 31 Aug 18:39 PDT 2015, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
>> The rx and tx channel info are laid out in memory next to each
>> other, and there are two types of channel info structures, byte
>> based and word based. We have 4 pointers to these info
>> structures, when we really only need two to point to the
>> different types of structures. Encapsulate the byte based and word
>> based tx/rx structures in a "full channel" structure that
>> describes the layout of memory and reduces the number of pointers
>> in the smd channel structure by two.
>>
> Saving the extra pointer doesn't feel like worth the change, but
> representing the pair of info structs as one sounds like a reasonable
> cleanup.

Agreed.

>
> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson 
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd 
>> ---
>>  drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c | 61 
>> +++---
>>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c
>> index edd9d9a37238..c16547b85e05 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c
>> @@ -65,7 +65,9 @@
>>   */
>>  
>>  struct smd_channel_info;
>> +struct smd_full_channel_info;
> I would have called this "smd_channel_info_pair"...

Sure I'll make the change and add your Reviewed-by.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Represent channel layout in structures

[Bjorn Andersson]

On Mon 31 Aug 18:39 PDT 2015, Stephen Boyd wrote:

> The rx and tx channel info are laid out in memory next to each
> other, and there are two types of channel info structures, byte
> based and word based. We have 4 pointers to these info
> structures, when we really only need two to point to the
> different types of structures. Encapsulate the byte based and word
> based tx/rx structures in a "full channel" structure that
> describes the layout of memory and reduces the number of pointers
> in the smd channel structure by two.
> 

Saving the extra pointer doesn't feel like worth the change, but
representing the pair of info structs as one sounds like a reasonable
cleanup.

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd 
> ---
>  drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c | 61 
> +++---
>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c
> index edd9d9a37238..c16547b85e05 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c
> @@ -65,7 +65,9 @@
>   */
>  
>  struct smd_channel_info;
> +struct smd_full_channel_info;

I would have called this "smd_channel_info_pair"...

>  struct smd_channel_info_word;
> +struct smd_full_channel_info_word;
>  

Regards,
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Represent channel layout in structures

[Bjorn Andersson]

On Mon 31 Aug 18:39 PDT 2015, Stephen Boyd wrote:

> The rx and tx channel info are laid out in memory next to each
> other, and there are two types of channel info structures, byte
> based and word based. We have 4 pointers to these info
> structures, when we really only need two to point to the
> different types of structures. Encapsulate the byte based and word
> based tx/rx structures in a "full channel" structure that
> describes the layout of memory and reduces the number of pointers
> in the smd channel structure by two.
> 

Saving the extra pointer doesn't feel like worth the change, but
representing the pair of info structs as one sounds like a reasonable
cleanup.

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd 
> ---
>  drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c | 61 
> +++---
>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c
> index edd9d9a37238..c16547b85e05 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c
> @@ -65,7 +65,9 @@
>   */
>  
>  struct smd_channel_info;
> +struct smd_full_channel_info;

I would have called this "smd_channel_info_pair"...

>  struct smd_channel_info_word;
> +struct smd_full_channel_info_word;
>  

Regards,
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/