Re: [PATCH 1/4] PCI: exynos: replace to one register accessor from each accessors

2017-01-11 Thread Jaehoon Chung
Hi Bjorn, On 01/12/2017 03:50 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > Hi Jaehoon, > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 05:16:11PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote: >> There is no reason to maintain *_blk/phy/elbi_* as register accessors. >> It can be replaced to one register accessor. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung

Re: [PATCH 1/4] PCI: exynos: replace to one register accessor from each accessors

2017-01-11 Thread Jaehoon Chung
Hi Bjorn, On 01/12/2017 03:50 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > Hi Jaehoon, > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 05:16:11PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote: >> There is no reason to maintain *_blk/phy/elbi_* as register accessors. >> It can be replaced to one register accessor. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung >>

Re: [PATCH 1/4] PCI: exynos: replace to one register accessor from each accessors

2017-01-11 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
Hi Jaehoon, On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 05:16:11PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote: > There is no reason to maintain *_blk/phy/elbi_* as register accessors. > It can be replaced to one register accessor. > > Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung > --- > drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c |

Re: [PATCH 1/4] PCI: exynos: replace to one register accessor from each accessors

2017-01-11 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
Hi Jaehoon, On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 05:16:11PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote: > There is no reason to maintain *_blk/phy/elbi_* as register accessors. > It can be replaced to one register accessor. > > Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung > --- > drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c | 214 >

Re: [PATCH 1/4] PCI: exynos: replace to one register accessor from each accessors

2016-12-24 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 05:17:37PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote: > There is no reason to maintain *_blk/phy/elbi_* as register accessors. > It can be replaced to one register accessor. > > Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung > --- > drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c | 214 >

Re: [PATCH 1/4] PCI: exynos: replace to one register accessor from each accessors

2016-12-24 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 05:17:37PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote: > There is no reason to maintain *_blk/phy/elbi_* as register accessors. > It can be replaced to one register accessor. > > Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung > --- > drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c | 214 >